[Building Sakai] [sakai-kernel] Version numbers.

[Ian Boston]

Chuck,
For clarification we are talking about the packaging name being, 

org.sakaiproject.nakamua

for those on Sakai dev, there was a vote on Sakai Kernel

no intention of dropping the org.sakaiproject part, the ? should have been a * perhaps ?
Ian

On 5 Feb 2010, at 20:19, csev wrote:

> 
> On Feb 4, 2010, at 8:38 AM, Ian Boston wrote:
> 
>> Do you have a view on the packaging name ?
>> 
>> org.sakaiproject.?
> 
> Again, my opinion does not matter - but since you asked...
> 
> I would *not* change this unless there was a feeling that this had become a very truly independent project with a life outside of Sakai and independent of Sakai.
> 
> And I do not see the kernel as a separate project.   I see package names as defining where to place responsibility for the code.  So we don't have com.sun and com.sunkernel - it makes no sense.
> 
> If the kernel became an apache project we would switch to org.apache - for example Hadoop is org.apache - not org.hadoop and many say hadoop is so big that it is larger than the rest of Apache combined - but the package is still org.apache.
> 
> /Chuck