[Building Sakai] release 1 SP1 of Lesson Builder

[Sean Keesler]

I'll throw out the idea of making a configurable option that you set for a
site type that enables/removes the integration with the other tools from the
UI...perhaps set with a property (lesson.builder.integration.sites=course,
project).

If I was a student that wanted to deploy the tool in my own "portfolio"
site, it would be only allow me to write/present content pages.
If I was a instructor that wanted to deploy it in a "course" site, then the
integration bits would be present.


Sean Keesler
130 Academy Street
Manlius, NY 13104
315-682-0830
sean.keesler at threecanoes.com



On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Hedrick Charles <hedrick at rutgers.edu>wrote:

> I'm about to branch Lesson Builder, because I think RC3 is really close to
> final. I've tried out everything to catch any last-minute regressions, and I
> think things are OK.
>
> So that opens me to doing things in trunk. If anyone wants to implement
> Lesson Builder but can't because you're using tools we don't support, I'd be
> happy to prioritize fixing the problem. Currently I assume you have the
> following:
>
> * assignments
> * samigo
> * jforum or message center (or both)
>
> I assume the issue at Miichigan is Mneme. I have Mneme installed in my
> development system, and I'm prepared to support it. The main reason this is
> complex is that I have to retrofit the plugin approach to Samigo, which
> wasn't originally done that way, but that's still only a one-day project.
>
> Are there other things stopping you?
>
> I don't think building is going to be an issue. The pom file will cause mvn
> to pull in the binaries of anything you're not using in production. So it
> should build OK. It should run, because you'd configure the XML files not to
> use the plugins for the things you don't actually have. You might end up
> with an unnecessary jar file in Lesson Builder's lib, but that doesn't seem
> like a big deal.
>
>
>
> On Dec 22, 2010, at 11:46:39 AM, Jim Eng wrote:
>
> > The problem I am asking about is probably part of the reason something
> like LB has not been available in Sakai sooner.  I'm really excited about
> LB, and I'm hopeful we can introduce it at Michigan. But if it requires us
> to include modules in our build that we do not use, we may not be able to do
> so.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sakai-dev mailing list
> sakai-dev at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-dev
>
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to
> sakai-dev-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of
> "unsubscribe"
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai-dev/attachments/20101230/61727cd9/attachment.html