[Building Sakai] Continuum, Hudson, Bamboo or some other ci server app

[Mark Breuker]

Hi Anth,

We are also experimenting with Continuous integration. We started with
Continuum but somehow it kept loosing its user account data. We are now
testing Bamboo which was easier to setup and seems more feature rich
(didn't do a side-by-side comparison though).

Also there is an active user base for Bamboo developing plugins to
extend its functionality. 

- Mark

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: sakai-dev-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org
[mailto:sakai-dev-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] Namens Anthony Whyte
Verzonden: donderdag 1 oktober 2009 17:31
Aan: Sakai Developers
Onderwerp: [Building Sakai] Continuum, Hudson,Bamboo or some other ci
server app

I'd like to implement a continuous integration server in order to  
perform automated builds, releases, etc..  I am interested in opinions  
relative to the strength and weaknesses of Continuum, Hudson, Bamboo,  
CruiseControl and any others the community may have experience in  
using.  One important selection criterion would be to choose a system  
that has a user base in the Sakai Community so that a pool of  
experienced admins could be drawn on for advice, etc.  UCT has a  
Continuum server running while Oxford, I believe, uses Hudson.

Suggestions and recommendations would be greatly appreciated.

Anth