[Deploying Sakai] Maintenance Branch Merge candidate: SAK-19778
Kevin Chan
kevin at media.berkeley.edu
Wed Jun 15 16:14:48 PDT 2011
Hi all,
Candidate Jira: https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-19778
Notification of attachment to Syllabus is terse and contains no Subject
Following:
https://confluence.sakaiproject.org/display/TCC/Maintenance+Branch+Merge+Policy
Items for Qualification followed by my notes:
> The change is narrow in scope (modest changes to a single project)
+1 (1 line change to Syllabus)
> The change has been reviewed and approved by tool lead for the
> maintenance branch
I am not sure who the tool lead for Syllabus is for the 2.7.x branch (is
that information somewhere in Confluence?).
However, a fix for trunk has been checked in and the patch was verified
against 2.7.1.
> The change does not require database changes
+1
> The change has been running in production for one month minimum
unknown, but since Rutgers verified the fix for 2.7.1 in Jan. 2011, so
perhaps its in their code for 6 months now
> Changes that could impact internationalization negatively must be
> tested in two languages that are not variants of the same country.
+1
> The change is non-disruptive to the user experience ( I.e. changes
> that don't require user retraining and are unlikely to break existing
> customizations). Exceptions to this rule may be made if the change is
> configurable and is disabled by default.
+1
> Prior to merging, the change must be tested with the target
> maintenance branch, by the requesting institution, using a documented
> test plan.
We are testing this fix now; however, I do not see a Sakai 2.7 Test Plan
for Syllabus:
https://confluence.sakaiproject.org/display/SYLLABUS/Home
> The change must be preceded by a public announcement on the
> production and dev lists that alerts community members to the
> impending addition of a new feature in one or more maintenance
> branches. The announcement will describe the new feature,
> configuration options, test plans, relevant tickets, etc. When the
> change is committed a follow-up announcement listing the branch
> revision incorporating the change will be published. The information
> provided in such announcements will also be added to relevant release
> notes in Confluence and elsewhere.
Is this email sufficient to satisfy the "public announcement" requirement?
Can someone list the locations re: where the 2.7.x (for example) release
notes are that requires updating?
Thanks,
--
Kevin Chan
Operations Team
Educational Technology Services
UC Berkeley
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/production/attachments/20110615/144b5c27/attachment.html
More information about the production
mailing list