[DG: Teaching & Learning] Sakai-11 - proposal ideas
Neal Caidin
neal.caidin at apereo.org
Wed Feb 26 12:43:03 PST 2014
Hi Alan,
What do you recommend as the best way for community members to keep up
to date with the Apereo Analytics Initiative?
I know you guys are working on a Confluence page. Can you please
announce when that is ready for public eyes?
For those going to the Open Apereo Conference, I believe you will be
having one or more sessions there as well, correct?
Thanks,
Neal
> Berg, Alan <mailto:A.M.Berg at uva.nl>
> February 26, 2014 at 3:05 PM
> Yes, I agree that is why the Apereo Analytics initiative is an
> interesting influence. Join in :)
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> Alan Berg
>
> Innovation working group
> On the use of ICT in Education & Research
> University of Amsterdam
> Postbus 1025 / 1000 BA Amsterdam
> Weesperzijde 190 / 1097 DZ Amsterdam
>
> ________________________________________
> From: pedagogy-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org
> [pedagogy-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] on behalf of Gregory
> Guthrie [guthrie at mum.edu]
> Sent: 26 February 2014 21:00
> To: pedagogy at collab.sakaiproject.org
> Subject: [DG: Teaching & Learning] Sakai-11 - proposal ideas
>
> I wasn't sure if this was the best place to post ideas and suggestions
> for future Sakai versions - but here goes...
>
> I would like to see more analysis tools in next versions of Sakai.
>
> 1) One might include some analysis of faculty and course interactions
> in the forums - and although defining the metrics would be the most
> important part of this, perhaps things like (thread depth, average
> response time, size of responses (to eliminate "me too! and chatter
> responses), faculty response time, number of 'like's to posts (per
> student, per faculty), ...).
>
> This would allow one to oversee a group of courses to see how
> interactive faculty are in their support of a course, and also how
> engaged in participation students are in a course(s).
>
> 2) A second area would be institutional reporting and accountability.
> This would include items perhaps like: (student forum submissions (pre
> student, per course), responses, assignments submitted (%age), date of
> last interaction, ...). This is important both for QC of course
> quality per these measures, but also a legal requirement for Federal
> Financial aid support.
>
> 3) One implementation feature to support this would be more automated
> ways to extract reporting data from Sakai. The sitestats reports are
> useful, but very limited in their range and format.
> We have setup one approach to this, where any internal report in sakai
> can be automatically extracted (csv, xml, json) so that external
> presentation and analysis tools can be used to better present,
> integrate, and aggregate it. From that we can then correlate data from
> various reports and give evaluation and performance tracking tables
> for each (and all...) courses.
>
> (I think that the Canvas LMS has some nice examples of such data
> access and reporting tools.)
>
> 4) A system of hierarchical reporting tools for : ( courses, faculty,
> departments, school, ...) so that administrators could easily QC and
> track the overall quality of courses using Sakai, perhaps most
> importantly for DE courses.
>
> If other Schools have already discovered or setup good ways to do
> this, we would love to hear of it.
> -------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> pedagogy mailing list
> pedagogy at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/pedagogy
>
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to
> pedagogy-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of
> "unsubscribe"
> _______________________________________________
> pedagogy mailing list
> pedagogy at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/pedagogy
>
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to
> pedagogy-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of
> "unsubscribe"
> Gregory Guthrie <mailto:guthrie at mum.edu>
> February 26, 2014 at 3:00 PM
> I wasn't sure if this was the best place to post ideas and suggestions
> for future Sakai versions - but here goes...
>
> I would like to see more analysis tools in next versions of Sakai.
>
> 1) One might include some analysis of faculty and course interactions
> in the forums - and although defining the metrics would be the most
> important part of this, perhaps things like (thread depth, average
> response time, size of responses (to eliminate "me too! and chatter
> responses), faculty response time, number of 'like's to posts (per
> student, per faculty), ...).
>
> This would allow one to oversee a group of courses to see how
> interactive faculty are in their support of a course, and also how
> engaged in participation students are in a course(s).
>
> 2) A second area would be institutional reporting and accountability.
> This would include items perhaps like: (student forum submissions (pre
> student, per course), responses, assignments submitted (%age), date of
> last interaction, ...). This is important both for QC of course
> quality per these measures, but also a legal requirement for Federal
> Financial aid support.
>
> 3) One implementation feature to support this would be more automated
> ways to extract reporting data from Sakai. The sitestats reports are
> useful, but very limited in their range and format.
> We have setup one approach to this, where any internal report in sakai
> can be automatically extracted (csv, xml, json) so that external
> presentation and analysis tools can be used to better present,
> integrate, and aggregate it. From that we can then correlate data from
> various reports and give evaluation and performance tracking tables
> for each (and all...) courses.
>
> (I think that the Canvas LMS has some nice examples of such data
> access and reporting tools.)
>
> 4) A system of hierarchical reporting tools for : ( courses, faculty,
> departments, school, ...) so that administrators could easily QC and
> track the overall quality of courses using Sakai, perhaps most
> importantly for DE courses.
>
> If other Schools have already discovered or setup good ways to do
> this, we would love to hear of it.
> -------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> pedagogy mailing list
> pedagogy at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/pedagogy
>
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to
> pedagogy-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of
> "unsubscribe"
--
Neal Caidin
Sakai Community Coordinator
Apereo Foundation
neal.caidin at apereo.org
Skype me! (but let me know in advance for the first interaction) - nealkdin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/pedagogy/attachments/20140226/be7b47f4/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: compose-unknown-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 770 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/pedagogy/attachments/20140226/be7b47f4/attachment-0002.jpg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: postbox-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1184 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/pedagogy/attachments/20140226/be7b47f4/attachment-0003.jpg
More information about the pedagogy
mailing list