[DG: Teaching & Learning] [DG: User Experience] micro-commentary use case for gradable content in Sakai 3?

[Michael Feldstein]

We'll want to look at web annotation tools that enable HTML fragments to be tagged and marked up. There's an interesting one for Moodle called Marginalia: http://www.geof.net/code/annotation

- m


-- 
Oracle
Michael Feldstein | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +1 8188172925 | Mobile: +1 9179218895 
Oracle Academic Enterprise Solutions
25 Christian Hill Road | Great Barrington, MA 01230 

Green Oracle	 Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment	 

-----Original Message-----
From: Nate Angell [mailto:nangell at rsmart.com] 
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 12:57 PM
To: Bruce D'Arcus
Cc: pedagogy Learning; Sakai UX
Subject: Re: [DG: User Experience] micro-commentary use case for gradable content in Sakai 3?

Bruce:

I'm copying the Sakai Teaching & Learning list as they are also engaged in designing Sakai 3 capabilities.

It will be important to record the detailed use case you bring up, where snippets of user content might be assessed/commented on, with or without also linking them to additional resources like rubrics.

I've often thought if this area if capabilities as an extension of a more generalized tagging capability, where one is associating user content with something else (eg, an assessment, a rubric) and possibly commenting on that association (eg, assessment feedback).

- Nate

On Sep 12, 2010, at 12:29 PM, "Bruce D'Arcus" <bdarcus at gmail.com> wrote:

> Not exactly sure where to go for this, but this list seems reasonable ...
>
> As I'm grading some discussion fora posts in my institutions 
> soon-to-be-legacy non-Sakai LMS, just want to make sure of something:
>
> For the new grading support in Sakai 3, I know that virtually anything 
> will be able to be graded using the same approach.
>
> I also recall discussion of the ability to use (and hopefully easily
> share) rubrics for grading of such items.
>
> What I don't recall is whether there will be support for 
> micro-commentary on content.
>
> E.g. use case:
>
> I am reading a discussion forum post and wish to highlight a section 
> of the post (a few words or sentences) that shows this problem or that 
> problem (which, BTW, is likely to have some connection to the rubric I 
> am using to assess the post as a whole).
>
> Possible "problems" I might want to flag might be mechanical issues 
> like word choice or grammar (e.g. issues common across courses), or 
> they might be content-based (more course-specific).
>
> So will this use case be supported?
>
> Bruce
> _______________________________________________
> sakai-ux mailing list
> sakai-ux at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-ux
>
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to sakai-ux-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
_______________________________________________
sakai-ux mailing list
sakai-ux at collab.sakaiproject.org
http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-ux

TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to sakai-ux-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"