[DG: Teaching & Learning] User Experience] Interesting blog post on CMS user interfaces

Michael Korcuska mkorcuska at sakaifoundation.org
Thu Nov 5 05:43:44 PST 2009


Just catching up on this from a busy Educause but I would say this is  
definitely squarely part of my vision for Sakai 3. I think the raw  
capabilities are being built into Sakai 3 to really make a substantial  
leap forward on being able to provide a variety of metaphors to  
instructors (and to students and researchers).

What we will need to do, once those raw capabilities are ready, is use  
them to construct different metaphors/models for site organization and  
store those as reusable templates. There will lots of interesting  
debates about which are best and how many there should be (a usability  
question), etcetera, but I look forward to those interactions in the  
community--I'll know Sakai 3 has arrived.

Michael

On Nov 4, 2009, at 10:49, John Norman wrote:

> I _think_ we have this one covered, at least in theory, in Sakai 3.
> The web page is our container, a common tag applied to a set of pages
> can be a higher-level container. I think it is interesting to
> speculate (as we have many times) whether a folder metaphor is more
> familiar/intuitive than a web page metaphor, but if we call one set/
> type of tags "folder names" we could render a folder metaphor too.
> Sitemap is like a folder 'explorer'
>
> Not to say the problem is solved, but I don't think the option is
> excluded.
>
> John
>
> On 4 Nov 2009, at 12:22, Ward, Lynn E. wrote:
>
>> I think we can probably identify the most common models.  But, the
>> system should be flexible enough to allow innovators to push the
>> envelope.  I think approach that Angel uses is quite interesting—
>> it’s basically modeled on a file system.  The instructor can create
>> folders and place any number of  objects inside each folder.  Object
>> types include discussion forums, html pages, assessments, wiki,
>> survey, blog, SCORM package, another folder, etc.  Every object can
>> be associated with specific learning objectives and outcomes.  And,
>> in advanced mode, the instructor can create agents that enable
>> conditional release, branching, and other types of triggers and
>> relationships among objects.
>>
>> The file system metaphor allows the instructor to organize the
>> course in whatever way she pleases: by time, topic, project, group,
>> or even by tool type if you happen to like the Sakai 2.x way of
>> doing things.  I’m not necessarily advocating a file system as the
>> visual metaphor.  But an object-oriented approach in which there are
>> containers (things that hold other things) and learning objects
>> (think content and activities—not necessarily traditional notion of
>> LO’s) that can be easily organized and  grouped in a way that
>> visually represents the instructor’s mental model of the course
>> could be very powerful.
>>
>> Lynn
>>
>>
>> ==========================
>> Lynn Ward, Principal Systems Analyst, Academic and Faculty Services
>> University Information Technology Services
>> Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
>> Information Technology and Communications Complex (IT 218R)
>> 535 West Michigan Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202
>> Phone: 317-278-5713  E-mail: leward at iupui.edu
>>
>> From: pedagogy-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:pedagogy-
>> bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] On Behalf Of Daphne Ogle
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 1:17 PM
>> To: Plourde, Mathieu
>> Cc: Michael Korcuska; pedagogy at collab.sakaiproject.org Learning;
>> Sakai UX
>> Subject: Re: [DG: Teaching & Learning] User Experience] Interesting
>> blog post on CMS user interfaces
>>
>> Yes, thanks for sharing Michael.  Mathieu's post makes me wonder if
>> we have a good understanding of the multiple types of course/
>> activity structures we need to support in Sakai 3?  It seems Moodle
>> handles the syllabus/time-based and topic-based structures which
>> make sense.  Are there others?  Understanding these will be key to
>> creating the right context, cues, flows to help faculty build there
>> course space in ways that match their mental models and then
>> represent the course in ways that make sense to students.
>>
>> -Daphne
>>
>> On Nov 3, 2009, at 6:21 AM, Plourde, Mathieu wrote:
>>
>>
>> Funny that this thing has come to a full circle… Anyone remember
>> VirtualU? The default course was a long table organized as a list of
>> event with links to discussions and resources.
>>
>> I think the goal of that article was not to say that organizing your
>> content in a calendar was the best way to think, but that the
>> defaults are what most faculty will select.
>>
>> If Sakai 3’s default is to present multiple options in terms of
>> course/activity structure, and can support faculty in choosing an
>> appropriate one to start with, half the battle will be won.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> =================================
>>
>> Mathieu Plourde, MBA
>> Project Leader, LMS/Instructional Designer
>> IT-Client Support & Services
>> mathieu at udel.edu
>>
>> =================================
>>
>> TOP LINKS:
>>
>> Technology Troubleshooting: http://www.udel.edu/help
>> Sakai at UD Support and Training: http://www.udel.edu/sakai/training
>>
>> =================================
>>
>> From: sakai-ux-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:sakai-ux-
>> bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] On Behalf Of Jacques Raynauld
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 8:51 AM
>> To: Sakai UX
>> Cc: Michael Korcuska; pedagogy at collab.sakaiproject.org Learning
>> Subject: Re: User Experience] Interesting blog post on CMS user
>> interfaces
>>
>> I also agree.  It is a very interesting article. I have always been
>> struck by the Moodle first page template that naturally leads to a
>> week or theme interpretation by users.  I think it is one of the
>> important factor that explains Moodle popularity. This is the kind
>> of need we wanted to adress in Sakai/Open Syllabus ... but in a more
>> semantic way than Moodle.
>>
>> Jacques Raynauld
>> HEC Montréal
>>
>> -------- Message original --------
>> Sujet : Re: [DG: User Experience] Interesting blog post on CMS
>> user    interfaces
>> De : harriet at caret.cam.ac.uk
>> Pour : Michael Korcuska <mkorcuska at sakaifoundation.org>
>> Copie à : "pedagogy at collab.sakaiproject.org Learning" <pedagogy at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>> , Sakai UX <sakai-ux at collab.sakaiproject.org>
>> Date : 2009-11-03 04:58
>>
>>
>> Very interesting - thanks Michael!
>>
>> There were a couple of paras that struck me particularly as relating
>> to the
>> possibilities for the new Sakai 3:
>>
>> "The buttons link to pages that simply provide a place to upload a
>> document,
>> which is exactly what most instructors do: upload word–processed
>> files of their
>> classroom materials. They are encouraged to “plug in” their content
>> under the
>> appropriate category instead of envisioning a translation of their
>> individual
>> pedagogical style into an online environment. Blackboard “tends to
>> encourage a
>> linear pathway through the content” [3], and its default is to
>> support easy
>> uploading and text entry to achieve that goal.
>> The construction of the course syllabus is a familiar beginning
>> point for most
>> instructors, yet few CMSs consider this. It would be natural and
>> useful for
>> novice instructors to see a blank schedule into which they could
>> create each
>> week’s or unit’s activities, rather than a selection of pre–set
>> buttons or
>> links. Most professors think in terms of the semester, and how their
>> pedagogical goals can be achieved within the context of time, rather
>> than
>> space. Some think in terms of topics they want to cover. Blackboard/
>> WebCT’s
>> default organization accepts neither of these approaches in its
>> initial
>> interface. It forces the instructor to think in terms of content
>> types instead,
>> breaking the natural structure of the semester, or of a list of
>> topics. Again,
>> we know that the setup can be customized with relative ease, by
>> going to the
>> Control Panel and selecting Manage Course Menu, then using Modify
>> buttons. You
>> could change all the course menu buttons into “Week 1”, “Week 2”, or
>> organize
>> by topic instead of content type. But few professors try that, or
>> they assume
>> that they can’t do it. Blackboard can be highly intimidating to
>> learn, and may
>> “seriously hinder” choices the faculty member makes while using the
>> tool [4].
>> Faculty are led by the interface of a CMS not only because they do  
>> not
>> immediately see an alternative, but because the familiar signposts
>> (the
>> Syllabus button) imply a single way of completing the task (upload a
>> document).
>> Only the Moodle system provides a default setup that looks like a
>> calendar-style
>> syllabus ..."
>>
>> I'd agree very strongly with this statement about pedagogies, and
>> the initial
>> presentation of potential course structures, rather than tools, to  
>> the
>> lecturer, seems to be something that Sakai 3 has the potential to
>> support
>>
>>
>> "Although it is an oversimplification, it is useful to separate  
>> course
>> management systems into two types: Opt–In and Opt–Out. In an Opt–Out
>> system
>> (such as Blackboard) all the features are available by default and
>> must be
>> excluded to avoid confusing students. Opt–Out systems are most
>> likely to
>> overwhelm Web novices, because they present an array of tools, and
>> the tendency
>> is to reduce cognitive load by using the defaults. In an Opt–In
>> system (such as
>> Moodle), the instructor selects each activity and presentation
>> factor from a
>> menu list, effectively designing much of the interface for students.
>> Fewer
>> defaults are pre–set, forcing the instructor to think holistically
>> about the
>> class structure. Features such as chat, polls, and interactive
>> lessons as
>> options presented with the same weight as more traditional text–based
>> resources. Thus there is less of an implication that presentation is
>> key, and
>> more of an implication that interactivity is important. In an Opt–In
>> environment, the instructor makes choices about context on a macro
>> level, and
>> choices about features and tools on a micro level. This makes it
>> possible to
>> explore pedagogical options more freely"
>>
>> Again, perhaps a future strength of Sakai 3?
>>
>> Harriet
>>
>>
>>
>> Quoting Michael Korcuska <mkorcuska at sakaifoundation.org>:
>>
>>
>> It's worth a read....
>>
>>
>>
>> http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2530/2303
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael Korcuska
>> Executive Director, Sakai Foundation
>> mkorcuska at sakaifoundation.org
>> phone: +1 510-859-4247 (google voice)
>> skype: mkorcuska
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sakai-ux mailing list
>> sakai-ux at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-ux
>>
>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to sakai-ux-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> with a subject of "unsubscribe"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sakai-ux mailing list
>> sakai-ux at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-ux
>>
>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to sakai-ux-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> with a subject of "unsubscribe"
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pedagogy mailing list
>> pedagogy at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/pedagogy
>>
>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to pedagogy-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> with a subject of "unsubscribe"
>>
>> Daphne Ogle
>> Senior Interaction Designer
>> University of California, Berkeley
>> Educational Technology Services
>> daphne at media.berkeley.edu
>> cell (925)348-4372
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pedagogy mailing list
>> pedagogy at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/pedagogy
>>
>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to pedagogy-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> with a subject of "unsubscribe"
>
> _______________________________________________
> pedagogy mailing list
> pedagogy at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/pedagogy
>
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to pedagogy-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org 
>  with a subject of "unsubscribe"

-- 
Michael Korcuska
Executive Director, Sakai Foundation
mkorcuska at sakaifoundation.org
phone: +1 510-859-4247 (google voice)
skype: mkorcuska






More information about the pedagogy mailing list