[Contrib: Evaluation System] be_evaluated vs. take_evaluation

[Daniel Merino]

Maybe the mess has its origin is in the spanish translation... as I'm 
understanding, is this right?

"Groups I can evaluate" -> Groups in which I can be an evaluatee 
(usually an student). Is included every user that has the 
"take.evaluation" permission.

"Groups I can be evaluated in" -> Groups in which a "special" question, 
where evaluatees can rate the evaluators, can be set. So this question 
is repeated for every evaluator (everyone with the "be evaluated" 
permission).


Translating to spanish, the most straightforward translation would be:

"Groups I can evaluate" -> Groups in which I can be an evaluator.
"Groups I can be evaluated in" -> Groups in which I can be an evaluatee.

and so we have translated it, so that's the problem.


In my opinion, this should be explained at Confluence, as there is a lot 
to lose in translation.

Thanks for your help and best regards.

Aaron Zeckoski escribió:
>> None of this applies if you assign to an ad hoc group as there is no associated site; everybody in the ad hoc group can be thought of as having the take.evaluation permish.
>>     
> That's not completely accurate as there can be "evaluatee" and
> "evaluator" in the adhoc groups, however, that is not exposed through
> the UI since those groups are almost always just evaluators.
>
> -AZ
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Adam Marshall
> <adam.marshall at oucs.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>   
>> Be.evaluated refers to the "lecturer questions" - if a question is set as such then it is repeated for all the people in the site with the be.evaluated permission. People with the take.evaluation permission are able to respond.
>>
>> None of this applies if you assign to an ad hoc group as there is no associated site; everybody in the ad hoc group can be thought of as having the take.evaluation permish.
>>
>> Not sure about your second question.
>>
>> Adam
>>
>>     
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: evaluation-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:evaluation-
>>> bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Merino
>>> Sent: 11 November 2011 12:51
>>> To: evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>> Subject: [Contrib: Evaluation System] be_evaluated vs. take_evaluation
>>>
>>> Hi everybody.
>>>
>>> When we started to run Evaluation System 1.2.1, we just followed the
>>> settings steps of  the permissions page at Confluence, so we gave the
>>> "be_evaluated" permission to instructors and the "take_evaluation"
>>> permission to students. All went fine then, so we did not make any question.
>>>
>>> Now with the 1.3 version of Evaluation System, we have noticed that the
>>> Site/Group listing shows one panel with "Groups I can be evaluated in"
>>> and "Groups I can evaluate". These groups seems to be related to those
>>> permissions.
>>>
>>> So we wonder two questions that we haven't found in the Confluence:
>>>
>>> -Which is the exact difference between "be evaluated" and "take
>>> evaluation"?
>>> -Is this panel really related to these two permissions?
>>>
>>> I hope that somebody can give us a little explanation to add in our own
>>> documentation.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>> Best regards.
>>> --
>>> Daniel Merino Echeverría
>>> daniel.merino at unavarra.es
>>> Gestor de teleformación - Centro Superior de Innovación Educativa.
>>> Tfno: 948-168489 - Universidad Pública de Navarra.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> evaluation mailing list
>>> evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/evaluation
>>>
>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to evaluation-
>>> unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> evaluation mailing list
>> evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/evaluation
>>
>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to evaluation-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   

-- 
Daniel Merino Echeverría
daniel.merino at unavarra.es
Gestor de teleformación - Centro Superior de Innovación Educativa.
Tfno: 948-168489 - Universidad Pública de Navarra.
--
No hay nada repartido de modo más equitativo en el mundo que la razón: 
todo el mundo está convencido de tener suficiente (Descartes)