[Contrib: Evaluation System] Category values in Evaluation System 1.3 x

[Beth Kirschner]

Thanks -- that helps. I suggest we update the test plan in confluence to use the properties definitions that are used out of the box -- Cathy, can you update the test plan?

- Beth

On May 12, 2011, at 3:28 PM, Rick Moyer wrote:

> Cathy,
> 
> This is caused from inconsistency in the message properties values.  Some schools use lecturer where others use instructors.  
> 
> Also is it a survey or an evaluation?
> 
> Regardless of the different choice of words, the values store in the database are consistent.
> 
> Rick
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: evaluation-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [evaluation-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] On Behalf Of Crouch, Catherine [crouch at umich.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 3:15 PM
> To: Nicola Monat-Jacobs
> Cc: evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org
> Subject: [Contrib: Evaluation System] Category values in Evaluation System      1.3 x
> 
> Hi Nicola,
> 
> I'm testing evals and have a question regarding Category values.  Section F. Test Instructor Items lists the following steps:
> 
>        • Edit a survey question and click the "Lecturer" radio button in the "Category" area.
>        • Save the question.
>        • Preview the survey and confirm that the question for the Lecturer is showing up for each of the preview instructors.
> 
> The system doesn't list Lecturer as a Category value.  Is this a bug or isn't that option used in production?
> 
> 
> [cid:cf44f7c4-41b1-43cc-afd4-37bd8d177775 at adsroot.itcs.umich.edu]
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Cathy
> _______________________________________________
> evaluation mailing list
> evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/evaluation
> 
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to evaluation-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
> 
>