[Contrib: Evaluation System] Any more bug fixes for EVALSYS 1.4.0?

Aaron Zeckoski azeckoski at unicon.net
Thu Dec 22 10:17:10 PST 2011


OK, just a heads upo that I am about to update pretty much every
producer and template shortly.
It's probably stuff that does not need to be in the tag to be honest
(it will need some testing).

-AZ

On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Jim Eng <jimeng at umich.edu> wrote:
> That's my fault. I copied an example into the jira ticket. Let's leave it as
> is for today and I will remove the version numbers (both on the file names
> and in the html tags) before making the tag.
>
> Jim
>
> Connected by DROID on Verizon Wireless
>
>
> -----Original message-----
>
> From: Aaron Zeckoski <azeckoski at unicon.net>
> To: gsilver <gsilver at umich.edu>
> Cc: Jim Eng <jimeng at umich.edu>, "evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org"
> <evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org>
> Sent: Thu, Dec 22, 2011 17:32:02 GMT+00:00
> Subject: Re: [Contrib: Evaluation System] Any more bug fixes for EVALSYS
> 1.4.0?
>
> I may have made more sense to just update the jquery.js to jquery
> 1.4.4 rather than changing all the html files. The idea with using a
> js file that had no version in the name was to avoid having to update
> tons of files each time.
> (or did you do it that way?)
>
> -AZ
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:14 PM, gsilver wrote:
>> I changed all references to 1.4.4, this is going to take quite a bit of
>> testing.  I will start on that tomorrow.
>>
>>        - Gonzalo
>>
>> On Dec 21, 2011, at 6:46 PM, Gonzalo Silverio wrote:
>>
>>> I'll take a look.
>>>
>>>       - Gonzalo
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> On Dec 21, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Aaron Zeckoski wrote:
>>>
>>>> That's what it looks like to me. And if that is the case, my previous
>>>> suggestion stands.
>>>>
>>>> -AZ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Jim Eng wrote:
>>>>> I don't have the details.  Maybe it was 1.4.4 that Lovemore needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jim
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 21, 2011, at 4:55 PM, Aaron Zeckoski wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The only versions I am seeing are 1.2.6 (in 2 separate files) and
>>>>>> 1.4.4. 1.2.6 is used in most places and 1.4.4 in a couple others. I
>>>>>> don't see 1.5 included anywhere. Can you point me to the places where
>>>>>> you are seeing that one?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -AZ
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Jim Eng wrote:
>>>>>>> I just heard about this, but I believe Lovemore added 1.5 because he
>>>>>>> needed functionality that did not exist in 1.4.4.  Going back to 1.4.4 on
>>>>>>> those pages would probably break some of Lovemore's work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jim
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Dec 21, 2011, at 4:04 PM, Aaron Zeckoski wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think I made all the headers consistent (and I tried hard not to
>>>>>>>> remove anything) but a sanity test would be a good idea at this
>>>>>>>> point
>>>>>>>> for sure.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I noticed we are using 3 different versions of jquery depending on
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> page. I really think we should consolidate down to 1 version.
>>>>>>>> Probably
>>>>>>>> 1.4.4 for now (since 1.5 broke things). Anyone have an opinion about
>>>>>>>> that?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.4.4.min.js
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -AZ
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Dec 21, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Aaron Zeckoski wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I fixed this in a few of the templates yesterday, but note that
>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>> will should use a relative path in RSF when referring to CSS or JS
>>>>>>>>>> files. Example:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is right:
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> rel="stylesheet" media="all" />
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is wrong but will still work (so it should be switched to the
>>>>>>>>>> other way):
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" media="all" />
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If anyone sees this in RSF templates and wants to fix it before
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> beta tag, please go for it.
>>>>>>>>>> I will be doing some normalizing of the RSF headers but I might
>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>> get that done before thursday morning.
>>>>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>>>>> -AZ
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Jim Eng wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> We would like to get a new beta tag of evalsys 1.4.0 on the qa
>>>>>>>>>>> server this week.  If anybody has additional bug fixes that should be
>>>>>>>>>>> included in this tag, please have them checked in to trunk and let me know
>>>>>>>>>>> before 11 a.m. EST Thursday.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Jim
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> evaluation mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>>>>>>>>>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/evaluation
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to
>>>>>>>>>>> evaluation-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of
>>>>>>>>>>> "unsubscribe"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> evaluation mailing list
>>>> evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/evaluation
>>>>
>>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to
>>>> evaluation-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of
>>>> "unsubscribe"
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile
>
>



-- 
Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile


More information about the evaluation mailing list