[Contrib: Evaluation System] Any more bug fixes for EVALSYS 1.4.0 ?

Jim Eng jimeng at umich.edu
Thu Dec 22 10:04:19 PST 2011


That's my fault. I copied an example into the jira ticket. Let's leave it as is for today and I will remove the version numbers (both on the file names and in the html tags) before making the tag.

Jim

Connected by DROID on Verizon Wireless

-----Original message-----
From: Aaron Zeckoski <azeckoski at unicon.net>
To: gsilver <gsilver at umich.edu>
Cc: Jim Eng <jimeng at umich.edu>, "evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org" <evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org>
Sent: Thu, Dec 22, 2011 17:32:02 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: [Contrib: Evaluation System] Any more bug fixes for EVALSYS 1.4.0?

I may have made more sense to just update the jquery.js to jquery
1.4.4 rather than changing all the html files. The idea with using a
js file that had no version in the name was to avoid having to update
tons of files each time.
(or did you do it that way?)

-AZ


On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:14 PM, gsilver <gsilver at umich.edu> wrote:
> I changed all references to 1.4.4, this is going to take quite a bit of testing.  I will start on that tomorrow.
>
>        - Gonzalo
>
> On Dec 21, 2011, at 6:46 PM, Gonzalo Silverio wrote:
>
>> I'll take a look.
>>
>>       - Gonzalo
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> On Dec 21, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Aaron Zeckoski <azeckoski at unicon.net> wrote:
>>
>>> That's what it looks like to me. And if that is the case, my previous
>>> suggestion stands.
>>>
>>> -AZ
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Jim Eng <jimeng at umich.edu> wrote:
>>>> I don't have the details.  Maybe it was 1.4.4 that Lovemore needed.
>>>>
>>>> Jim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 21, 2011, at 4:55 PM, Aaron Zeckoski wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The only versions I am seeing are 1.2.6 (in 2 separate files) and
>>>>> 1.4.4. 1.2.6 is used in most places and 1.4.4 in a couple others. I
>>>>> don't see 1.5 included anywhere. Can you point me to the places where
>>>>> you are seeing that one?
>>>>>
>>>>> -AZ
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Jim Eng <jimeng at umich.edu> wrote:
>>>>>> I just heard about this, but I believe Lovemore added 1.5 because he needed functionality that did not exist in 1.4.4.  Going back to 1.4.4 on those pages would probably break some of Lovemore's work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jim
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Dec 21, 2011, at 4:04 PM, Aaron Zeckoski wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think I made all the headers consistent (and I tried hard not to
>>>>>>> remove anything) but a sanity test would be a good idea at this point
>>>>>>> for sure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I noticed we are using 3 different versions of jquery depending on the
>>>>>>> page. I really think we should consolidate down to 1 version. Probably
>>>>>>> 1.4.4 for now (since 1.5 broke things). Anyone have an opinion about
>>>>>>> that?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.4.4.min.js
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -AZ
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Dec 21, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Aaron Zeckoski wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I fixed this in a few of the templates yesterday, but note that you
>>>>>>>>> will should use a relative path in RSF when referring to CSS or JS
>>>>>>>>> files. Example:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is right:
>>>>>>>>> <link href="../css/evaluation_base.css" type="text/css"
>>>>>>>>> rel="stylesheet" media="all" />
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is wrong but will still work (so it should be switched to the other way):
>>>>>>>>> <link href="/sakai-evaluation-tool/content/css/evaluation_base.css"
>>>>>>>>> type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" media="all" />
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If anyone sees this in RSF templates and wants to fix it before the
>>>>>>>>> beta tag, please go for it.
>>>>>>>>> I will be doing some normalizing of the RSF headers but I might not
>>>>>>>>> get that done before thursday morning.
>>>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>>>> -AZ
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Jim Eng <jimeng at umich.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> We would like to get a new beta tag of evalsys 1.4.0 on the qa server this week.  If anybody has additional bug fixes that should be included in this tag, please have them checked in to trunk and let me know before 11 a.m. EST Thursday.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jim
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> evaluation mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>>>>>>>>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/evaluation
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to evaluation-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> evaluation mailing list
>>> evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/evaluation
>>>
>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to evaluation-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
>>>
>>>
>



-- 
Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/evaluation/attachments/20111222/6b8d99b2/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the evaluation mailing list