[Contrib: Evaluation System] If a survey is closed and then reopened it loses its original dates

[Aaron Zeckoski]

I would recommend that the right solution is to add an option to show
the results of open surveys rather than trying to change the behavior
of the close and reopen date handling.

-AZ


On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Adam Marshall
<adam.marshall at oucs.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
> Thanks for that explanation. It makes more sense now.
>
> The main reason why people close surveys is to see what results have been garnered part-way through the survey (fairly common but, if possible, we intend to address this by letting people view results of open surveys)
>
> Adam
>
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: azeckoski at gmail.com [mailto:azeckoski at gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> | Aaron Zeckoski
> | Sent: 17 May 2010 12:30
> | To: Adam Marshall
> | Cc: evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org
> | Subject: Re: [Contrib: Evaluation System] If a survey is closed and
> | then reopened it loses its original dates
> |
> | To provide the technical background here:
> | When a survey is forced closed the dates are adjusted so that the
> | closing date is set for the nearest future minute and the other dates
> | are adjusted to correspond. Since dates completely control the state
> | of an evaluation this is the only way to actually cause one to close
> | early.
> | When the evaluation is reopened the closing date would be in the past
> | (along with the other dates). To correct for this the system will use
> | the default length controls to set the initial dates and then places
> | the user on the page with the dates directly in front of them and
> | controls to adjust them.
> |
> | As for the issue, I don't really see the problem here. If a user
> | closes the evaluation then they clearly did not care about the dates
> | anymore so why would they expect them to be retained? If you move an
> | event on your calendar do you expect it to remember all the previous
> | dates it was associated with?
> |
> | If you have users closing and reopening evaluations a lot then perhaps
> | there is a reason why they are doing this. I suspect this is the real
> | issue.
> |
> | -AZ
> |
> |
> | On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Adam Marshall
> | <adam.marshall at oucs.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
> | > Aaron suggested that I ask the list's opinion on this matter.
> | >
> | > Some of our users have complained that when a survey is (temporally)
> | closed and reopened the original closing dates are replaced by the
> | default close date.
> | >
> | > Say today is the 17 may (which it is). Set up a survey and change the
> | default close date (say 20 may) to be 18 June, assign it to a group and
> | so on.
> | >
> | > Then go into the dashboard and close survey then go back and re-open.
> | The survey close date will now NOT be 18 June but will be set to the
> | default close date (20 may).
> | >
> | > We find this to be counter intuitive and has caused problems with
> | people not noticing that the close date has been silently brought
> | forward.
> | >
> | > I would propose that the original dates be kept when a survey is
> | closed & reopened. Is there any good reason why this shouldn't be the
> | case?
> | >
> | > Adam
> | > _______________________________________________
> | > evaluation mailing list
> | > evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org
> | > http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/evaluation
> | >
> | > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to evaluation-
> | unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
> | >
> |
> |
> |
> | --
> | Aaron Zeckoski - Software Engineer - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile
>



-- 
Aaron Zeckoski - Software Engineer - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile