[Contrib: Evaluation System] Question about EvalSys

Mon Jun 14 07:54:25 PDT 2010

All,

I've created an agenda in Confluence for the Denver BoF:

	http://confluence.sakaiproject.org/display/EVALSYS/06_17_2010+Denver+Sakai+Conference+BoF

I've added for discussion the two specific Jiras referenced in this thread

	http://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/EVALSYS-888
	http://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/EVALSYS-869

Is there anyone who has access to an audio recorder and is willing to post the resulting data to Confluence after the BoF?

SMD.

On Jun 14, 2010, at 5:09 AM, Adam Marshall wrote:

> I would love to listen in but will be unable to due to the time. Will there be any sort of audio record of the meeting?
>  
> In addition I'd like to say that we have some resources to "spend" on the evaluations tool (I think we'll be using a consultant to do some work).
>  
> We're keen to fix outstanding bugs but we'd like to be sure that we're not spending money on bugs that have been fixed but just havent been contributed back yet.
>  
> One thing I'd request from the meeting (if I'm allowed to do that) is that a timetable be drawn up for instuitutions to commit their local changes. That could then inform us of a good time to start knocking of the remaining "big" issues.
>  
> Another thing that it would be good to get an opinion on is http://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/EVALSYS-888 We've recently uncommented the code mentioned in Lovemore's comment on 12 May and this does the trick.
>  
> If nothing else, it would be good to get and agreement about whether to permanenetly uncomment the code or whether to introduce a configuration property which states whether to ignore the previously commented code or not.
>  
> We would not want to commit to managing the merge or testing but we would definitelty like to be part of the QA process.
>  
> adam
>  
> From: evaluation-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:evaluation-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] On Behalf Of Sean DeMonner
> Sent: 12 June 2010 01:26
> To: Aaron Zeckoski
> Cc: evaluation
> Subject: Re: [Contrib: Evaluation System] Question about EvalSys
>  
> I think there has been talk of doing a release but it is held up by lack of QA resources to test the current code (and possibly dev
> resources to fix bugs). Is rsmart working on the eval tool now or are you just selling it as is?
>  
>  
> At least as far as U-M is concerned, the delays we've had snapping back to trunk have been more a function of being saturated with meeting local demands than anything else.
>  
> There is an EVALSYS BoF scheduled at the conference for Wed at 11:45 am MDT; we will also attempt to dial in the Sakai conference bridge for those who are not attending the conference:
>  
>           Sakai 003 Conference Bridge for 11:45-13:00 MDT (GMT-7) on Thurs 6/17: 
>             Name: Sakai003 - Ad-hoc
>             Telephone: +1-812-856-7060 
>             Internet:156.56.240.9
>             Conference Code: 22386# 
>             PIN: 72524# 
>  
> Perhaps Mukul's question could be answered there, or at least routed.
>  
> Like last year I'd expect there will be discussion around how to coordinate the merging of the various branches back to trunk, building and testing a new tag, etc. Hopefully someone will offer the resource(s) to coordinate that merge and test effort. The current plan for Michigan is to revisit the merging question after we finish automating our Production environment; with luck that will be the end of the July.
>  
> SMD.
>  
>  
>  
>  
> On Jun 11, 2010, at 8:00 PM, Aaron Zeckoski wrote:
> 
> 
> I think that UM knows the email handling part of the code best. They
> may have a comment on this.
> 
> That said, I have been using that feature for the past few days and it
> seems to be working fine for us. I was running trunk though and 1.2.1
> is really old at this point. I don't really have a good sense of the
> stuff in 1.2.1 anymore since it has been so long since it was
> released.
> 
> I think there has been talk of doing a release but it is held up by
> lack of QA resources to test the current code (and possibly dev
> resources to fix bugs). Is rsmart working on the eval tool now or are
> you just selling it as is?
> 
> -AZ
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Mukul Tiwari <mtiwari at rsmart.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Aaron,
>  
> I had a question about the administrative control email handling. Looks like
> even though that feature is there it is not implemented in the Evaluation
> Tool. Also, within the Evaluation setting, checking "Never" to send email
> does not work either and it continues to send email to users. There is also
> an outstanding issue regarding this:
>  
> http://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/EVALSYS-869
>  
> Can you tell me if there is a configuration that I overlooked or if this is
> not implemented. Will there be any near future release that will have the
> implementation. We are using version 1.2.1.
>  
> Regards,
> Mukul Tiwari
> rSmart
>  
>  
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Aaron Zeckoski - Software Engineer - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile
> _______________________________________________
> evaluation mailing list
> evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/evaluation
> 
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to evaluation-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
> 
> 
>  
> 
> SMD.
>  
>  
> ==========================================================
> Sean DeMonner, IT Senior Project Manager, CTools Implementation Group
> Digital Media Commons @ The Duderstadt Center, U-M      (734) 615-9765
>  
> 
> 

==========================================================
Sean DeMonner, IT Senior Project Manager, CTools Implementation Group
Digital Media Commons @ The Duderstadt Center, U-M      (734) 615-9765

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/evaluation/attachments/20100614/143456b9/attachment-0001.html 