[cle-release-team] [WG: Sakai QA] Evaluations QA Server: qa5-us.sakaiproject.org

[Beth Kirschner]

Thanks - that makes sense. I confess to being guilty of just skimming some of the release process discussions.

- Beth

On May 8, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Matthew Jones <matthew at longsight.com> wrote:

> Hi Beth, the RC releases are a different process than the actual releases. This was described to the release team and TCC back in January in this email.
> 
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/cle-release-team/2013-January/001338.html
> 
> The RC releases just are a pack-demo build from sakai-2.9.x-all at some particular revision. The real releases actually tag and release all artifacts individually. The actual release process can take 4-8 hours to process. It is an overnight process because of the slow turnaround on artifact publishing, building, uploading through Sonatype and release. The RC can be generated in under an hour. Even if this time wasn't volunteered, it's better to make this as efficient as possible since the only people (who should be) running it are the QA server admins.
> 
> There won't be any individual tool tags for the RC because the process that does this is the maven release plugin (for the indies) which I don't run because of that aforementioned time consumption. And it doesn't make sense to tag the core without the indies What I was interested in doing was putting hard coded revisions into an external like
> 
> assignments -r122313 https://source.sakaiproject.org/svn/assignment/branches/assignment-2.9.x/
> 
> So someone could actually check this out if they wanted a copy of the source at that revision. Dave contributed this script.
> 
> The final 2.9.2 release will have tags for indie and core as usual. 
> 
> This is something Steve has been talking about on the lists, if we got rid of more (all?) of the indies it wouldn't be such a big deal to take care of this, but as it stands now, with the varying versions and specific release order it can't be done super easy and be correct.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Beth Kirschner <bkirschn at umich.edu> wrote:
> Sorry - looks like I mistook the 2.9.0-rc02 tag for 2.9.2-rc02 tag. There appear to be no tags for the 2.9.2 release - sorry for not keeping track, but I'm curious why we're not tagging 2.9.2.
> 
> - Beth
> 
> On May 8, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Beth Kirschner <bkirschn at umich.edu> wrote:
> 
> > Oops - I just noticed we now have a tag (in progress). Just let us know what antisamy setting you'd like us to use when RC02 is ready.
> >
> > - Beth
> >
> > On May 8, 2013, at 12:21 PM, Beth Kirschner <bkirschn at umich.edu> wrote:
> >
> >> We could do that as well, but it would be easier of there was a tagged version of 2.9.2-RC02 we could deploy.
> >>
> >> - Beth
> >>
> >> On May 8, 2013, at 9:47 AM, Neal Caidin <nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Beth,
> >>>
> >>> It looks like we could use another QA server when CLE 2.9.2-rc02 (release candidate 02) is cut, which should be fairly soon. We are losing one QA server temporarily due to vacation and it would be nice to have one server with AntiSamy off, one with AntiSamy on low setting and one with AntiSamy on high setting, plus a 2.9.1 server. We are losing, temporarily, our Antisamy high setting server for QA. We've got the others covered. Blackboard is running the 2.9.1 QA server at the moment.
> >>>
> >>> For your consideration.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Neal
> >>>
> >>> On May 7, 2013, at 11:58 AM, Beth Kirschner <bkirschn at umich.edu> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Michigan has been running the QA5 server with an old 2.9 release candidate + Evaluations 1.4 for awhile. Additionally, Indiana has been running the experimental QA server (http://nightly2.sakaiproject.org:8085/portal) with a number of contrib tools, including evaluations (trunk).
> >>>>
> >>>> We'd like to try to make best use of these two servers as follows:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1) Update QA5 to running Sakai 2.9.1 (and eventually Sakai 2.9.2)
> >>>> 2) Leverage the experimental server for evaluations testing. This server is currently running evaluations trunk, but Indiana has offered to switch this to a tagged version of Evaluations if needed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Please let me know if you have any concerns with these changes by the end of this week. We'll work to update QA5 next week, barring any issues.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>> - Beth
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> sakai-qa mailing list
> >>>> sakai-qa at collab.sakaiproject.org
> >>>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-qa
> >>>>
> >>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to sakai-qa-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
> >>>
> >>
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cle-release-team mailing list
> cle-release-team at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cle-release-team
>