[cle-release-team] RC01? - Re: 2.9.2 status check

Tue Apr 16 13:30:21 PDT 2013

I started merge work on KNL-1051, a ticket which may set an all-time record for the number of individual commits that require merging.  I get a kernel compilation error after merging in the kernel changes (which I have not committed to the branch): 

[ERROR] /Users/arwhyte/Development/svn/kernel/kernel-1.3.x/kernel-impl/src/main/java/org/sakaiproject/component/impl/BasicConfigurationService.java:[939,8] cannot find symbol
symbol : variable Arrays
location: class org.sakaiproject.component.impl.BasicConfigurationService
[INFO] 1 error

Cheers,

Anth

On Apr 16, 2013, at 4:05 PM, Neal Caidin wrote:

> 
> I don't see any definitive answers so I'm not sure about a realistic schedule. 
> 
> We are just zero or two issues away from being ready to cut a release. But we don't have a plan to get RC01 cut yet. 
> 
> So, any advice appreciated. No decision means further schedule slipping. 
> 
> I was hoping we would get a release cut this afternoon, but sounds like it could be at least a day or two more?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Neal
> 
> 
> On Apr 16, 2013, at 10:27 AM, Neal Caidin <nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org> wrote:
> 
>> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/KNL-1038 has a merge failure.  So we would need for this to be fixed.
>> 
>> Last comment was : 
>> 
>> "Reverse merge of r122614 done in r122658.... Reversed it due to failing test in 1.3.x. 
>> 
>> Before merging again, need to figure out an dependencies for the test failure."
>> 
>> 
>> -- Neal
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 16, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Aaron Zeckoski <azeckoski at unicon.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> I think these both should be merged. Why not merge a verified fix? Only have my phone email today.
>>> 
>>> On Apr 16, 2013 9:38 AM, "Neal Caidin" <nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/KNL-1051 was verified, but maybe it would not hurt to be in trunk a little longer.  Perhaps some additional testing with changes to local properties, and make sure those behave as expected, would not be a bad idea. I definitely don't think we need to hold up CLE 2.9.2 for this one.
>>> 
>>> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/KNL-1038 - is listed as a blocker, but I don't understand it well enough to know for sure if it is serious enough to hold up the release. My guess is that it is not.
>>> 
>>> 2 cents.
>>> 
>>> If Matt is available to cut the RC01 today, that would seem like a good thing to me.
>>> 
>>> It would be nice to hear other voices :-)
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Neal
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Apr 15, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Anthony Whyte <arwhyte at umich.edu> wrote:
>>> 
>>> > I don't think they need to hold up RC 01.  Whether they hold up 2.9.2 is for the release team to decide.
>>> >
>>> > I want to keep them on the radar since they are currently not flagged for 2.9.2 (other than a 2.9.2 triage label on at least one of the tickets).
>>> >
>>> > Anth
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Apr 15, 2013, at 11:47 AM, Neal Caidin wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Which need to be addressed before the release, but not before RC01, correct?
>>> >>
>>> >> -- Neal
>>> >>
>>> >> On Apr 15, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Anthony Whyte <arwhyte at umich.edu> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> There are also permission back-fill conversion script issues raised by Chuck Hedrick that remain unresolved.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-23471
>>> >>> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-14373
>>> >>> both related to
>>> >>> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/KNL-1024
>>> >>>
>>> >>> / Anth
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Apr 15, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Neal Caidin wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Good points Anthony. Thanks.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Matt says he might be able to "cut" the release by tomorrow afternoon/evening (assuming things are ready and depending on his availability). That means one QA server - Longsight.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Alan Berg says he will be available to configure his QA server on Wednesday. I haven't checked with Chuck H. yet.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I'm finishing up the final details of the test plan. final-final details require the QA servers to be up and running.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> From these data points, I'm guessing we will be able to start testing on Thursday, but there are still a few "hanging chads" (aka final details).
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> FYI - My availability next week is spotty, unfortunately, including probably missing a 1/2 day Tuesday morning (Eastern Daylight), part of Wednesday afternoon, and then I'm unavailable Thursday, April 25 through April 29 (though I should be able to check in on things this day, at a minimum). I'm not sure how/if this will impact things.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> The sooner we can finalize things the better, so I can send out a call to the community asking for QA help.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Cheers,
>>> >>>> Neal
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Apr 15, 2013, at 10:37 AM, Anthony Whyte <arwhyte at umich.edu> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> Down to 4 tickets at present, three of which are not ready to merge due to either missing info, merge conflicts or reversions due to problems.  Per the AntiSamy proposal we've got a day left before we are supposed to cut RC1.  I think we could live without both KNLs (never mind the SAKs).
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Are you guys comfortable with KNL-1051?
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Finally, I think emails such as this should be public and posted to the cle-release-team.  While I appreciate the politeness that no doubt serves as the motivation behind these private posts, I think we should talk about this stuff in public.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Cheers,
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Anth
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> On Apr 15, 2013, at 7:51 AM, Neal Caidin wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Hey guys,
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> It seems like BLTI 2.1.0 is merged and I think so is AntiSamy ?
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> It appears there are 1/2 dozen merges left, with one blocker:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/KNL-1038
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Is this a true blocker for 2.9.2 or can we proceed without it, and fix for 2.9.3? If it gets fixed will we be ready to create RC01?
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Thanks,
>>> >>>>>> Neal
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> cle-release-team mailing list
>>> >>>> cle-release-team at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>> >>>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cle-release-team
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cle-release-team mailing list
>>> cle-release-team at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cle-release-team
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cle-release-team mailing list
> cle-release-team at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cle-release-team

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/cle-release-team/attachments/20130416/078769ab/attachment-0006.html 