[samigo-team] future of the samigo working group--do we need separate meetings?

Tue Jun 10 06:08:57 PDT 2014

Thanks Keli and Neal--I think a July meeting would be good, to discuss the
best path forward for Samigo development.

Jim Mezzanotte
Asahi Net International

On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:00 PM, <samigo-team-request at collab.sakaiproject.org
> wrote:

> Send samigo-team mailing list submissions to
>         samigo-team at collab.sakaiproject.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/samigo-team
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         samigo-team-request at collab.sakaiproject.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         samigo-team-owner at collab.sakaiproject.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of samigo-team digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: future of the samigo working group--do we need separate
>       meetings? (Keli Sato Amann)
>    2. Re: future of the samigo working group--do we need separate
>       meetings? (Neal Caidin)
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Keli Sato Amann <kamann at stanford.edu>
> To: Neal Caidin <neal.caidin at apereo.org>
> Cc: Samigo Team <samigo-team at collab.sakaiproject.org>
> Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 09:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: Re: [samigo-team] future of the samigo working group--do we need
> separate meetings?
> Neal, that sounds ideal. I can convene one last meeting in the first
> Tuesday of July--to be clear, if there is enough interest in continuing
> regular meetings, it should continue, but I think others should organize
> them, as my time is being committed elsewhere.
>
> Keli
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Neal Caidin" <neal.caidin at apereo.org>
> To: "Keli Sato Amann" <kamann at stanford.edu>
> Cc: "Samigo Team" <samigo-team at collab.sakaiproject.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 5:04:48 AM
> Subject: Re: [samigo-team] future of the samigo working group--do we need
> separate meetings?
>
> Hi Keli,
>
> My sense is that there would be interest in looking at proposed new
> features for Samigo, but I think there would be even more interest in
> having the discussion about the future of the Samigo Working Group.
> Could we use the first Tuesday of July to discuss primarily this topic?
>
> I think your questions are fair. How about I get feedback from the
> Teaching and Learning group and the Sakai Core team and bring their
> feedback as input to the July meeting?
>
> How does that sound?
>
> Thanks,
> Neal
>
>
> > Keli Sato Amann <mailto:kamann at stanford.edu>
> > June 4, 2014 at 4:05 PM
> > Hello,
> > Thanks to all who came and talked on Tuesday in Miami during our BOF.
> > We ended up not having enough time to talk about the future of the
> > Samigo Working Group and instead spent most time talking about Tests &
> > Quizzes in Sakai 10. The working group has been meeting at least
> > monthly for the last three years to do new feature review, bug bashes,
> > and review of proposed designs. It was originally intended to move
> > "SAMigo to a community stewardship model." And in fact, I think this
> > has already happened on the development side, with many more people
> > becoming familiar enough with the code beyond Stanford to have
> > responsibility for committing new contributions, which have always
> > come from far and wide. However, much of that has occurred
> > asynchronously, online, separate from the working group.
> >
> > However, in terms of convening the meetings, it has largely been
> > Stanford doing the organizing for the last year, and my time is
> > getting committed elsewhere. So three questions:
> > 1) do we actually need to meet on a regular basis?
> > 2) if so, are there volunteers to convene the meetings?
> > 3) if we don't meet, do we need a samigo-team mailing list or should
> > we be doing this on dev? on pedagogy? (I am posting this separately to
> > these lists)
> >
> > During my remote presentation in Miami
> > (https://confluence.sakaiproject.org/display/SAM/Miami+2014+Apereo+BOF),
> > I was going to propose that we not meet unless someone wants to do a
> > demo of proposed new features or improvements and then it would be
> > that person's job to organize a live review or simply to forward
> > information about the new feature (preferably a JIRA) and ask for
> > comments within a certain time period.
> >
> > However, if someone wants to meet and have a discussion about this,
> > they should propose and convene that meeting (perhaps the first
> > Tuesday of July, but we don't have to stick to tradition).
> >
> >
> > Keli Amann
> > User Experience Specialist
> > Academic Computing Services, Stanford University
> > _______________________________________________
> > samigo-team mailing list
> > samigo-team at collab.sakaiproject.org
> > http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/samigo-team
>
> --
> Neal Caidin
> Sakai Community Coordinator
> Apereo Foundation
> neal.caidin at apereo.org
> Skype me! (but let me know in advance for the first interaction) - nealkdin
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Neal Caidin <neal.caidin at apereo.org>
> To: Keli Sato Amann <kamann at stanford.edu>
> Cc: Samigo Team <samigo-team at collab.sakaiproject.org>
> Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:47:00 -0400
> Subject: Re: [samigo-team] future of the samigo working group--do we need
> separate meetings?
> Hi Keli,
>
> Sounds good. So this will be July 1, @ 2pm Eastern?
>
> Just before July 4th so we better get the word out quickly before everyone
> plans their July 4th vacations (in the U.S.A). ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> Neal
>
>
>   Keli Sato Amann <kamann at stanford.edu>
>  June 9, 2014 at 12:32 PM
> Neal, that sounds ideal. I can convene one last meeting in the first
> Tuesday of July--to be clear, if there is enough interest in continuing
> regular meetings, it should continue, but I think others should organize
> them, as my time is being committed elsewhere.
>
> Keli
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Neal Caidin" <neal.caidin at apereo.org> <neal.caidin at apereo.org>
> To: "Keli Sato Amann" <kamann at stanford.edu> <kamann at stanford.edu>
> Cc: "Samigo Team" <samigo-team at collab.sakaiproject.org>
> <samigo-team at collab.sakaiproject.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 5:04:48 AM
> Subject: Re: [samigo-team] future of the samigo working group--do we need
> separate meetings?
>
> Hi Keli,
>
> My sense is that there would be interest in looking at proposed new
> features for Samigo, but I think there would be even more interest in
> having the discussion about the future of the Samigo Working Group.
> Could we use the first Tuesday of July to discuss primarily this topic?
>
> I think your questions are fair. How about I get feedback from the
> Teaching and Learning group and the Sakai Core team and bring their
> feedback as input to the July meeting?
>
> How does that sound?
>
> Thanks,
> Neal
>
>
>
>   Neal Caidin <neal.caidin at apereo.org>
>  June 9, 2014 at 8:04 AM
>  Hi Keli,
>
> My sense is that there would be interest in looking at proposed new
> features for Samigo, but I think there would be even more interest in
> having the discussion about the future of the Samigo Working Group. Could
> we use the first Tuesday of July to discuss primarily this topic?
>
> I think your questions are fair. How about I get feedback from the
> Teaching and Learning group and the Sakai Core team and bring their
> feedback as input to the July meeting?
>
> How does that sound?
>
> Thanks,
> Neal
>
>
>
>   Keli Sato Amann <kamann at stanford.edu>
>  June 4, 2014 at 4:05 PM
> Hello,
> Thanks to all who came and talked on Tuesday in Miami during our BOF. We
> ended up not having enough time to talk about the future of the Samigo
> Working Group and instead spent most time talking about Tests & Quizzes in
> Sakai 10. The working group has been meeting at least monthly for the last
> three years to do new feature review, bug bashes, and review of proposed
> designs. It was originally intended to move "SAMigo to a community
> stewardship model." And in fact, I think this has already happened on the
> development side, with many more people becoming familiar enough with the
> code beyond Stanford to have responsibility for committing new
> contributions, which have always come from far and wide. However, much of
> that has occurred asynchronously, online, separate from the working group.
>
> However, in terms of convening the meetings, it has largely been Stanford
> doing the organizing for the last year, and my time is getting committed
> elsewhere. So three questions:
> 1) do we actually need to meet on a regular basis?
> 2) if so, are there volunteers to convene the meetings?
> 3) if we don't meet, do we need a samigo-team mailing list or should we be
> doing this on dev? on pedagogy? (I am posting this separately to these
> lists)
>
> During my remote presentation in Miami (
> https://confluence.sakaiproject.org/display/SAM/Miami+2014+Apereo+BOF), I
> was going to propose that we not meet unless someone wants to do a demo of
> proposed new features or improvements and then it would be that person's
> job to organize a live review or simply to forward information about the
> new feature (preferably a JIRA) and ask for comments within a certain time
> period.
>
> However, if someone wants to meet and have a discussion about this, they
> should propose and convene that meeting (perhaps the first Tuesday of July,
> but we don't have to stick to tradition).
>
>
> Keli Amann
> User Experience Specialist
> Academic Computing Services, Stanford University
> _______________________________________________
> samigo-team mailing list
> samigo-team at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/samigo-team
>
>
> --
> Neal Caidin
> Sakai Community Coordinator
> Apereo Foundation
> neal.caidin at apereo.org
> Skype me! (but let me know in advance for the first interaction) - nealkdin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> samigo-team mailing list
> samigo-team at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/samigo-team
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/samigo-team/attachments/20140610/b9679373/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: compose-unknown-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 770 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/samigo-team/attachments/20140610/b9679373/attachment.jpg 