[sakai2-tcc] Java 6 vs Java 7 - was Re: [cle-release-team] Emerging consensus to focus on 2.10

[Aaron Zeckoski]

It would probably take the industry generally moving to java 7 which
they are not really doing yet. When we see people dropping java 6
support we can review this but for now we should support both 6 and 7.
We could probably change the recommendation to 7 if a majority prefers
that and it matches what we are using on the QA servers.
-AZ


On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Neal Caidin <neal.caidin at apereo.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our release notes show Java 6 as being preferred -
> https://confluence.sakaiproject.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=82249316
>
> What will it take to make Java 7 preferred? Or will this already be the case
> for Sakai 4 ;-) ?
>
> Neal
>
>
>
> Neal Caidin
> Sakai CLE Community Coordinator
> neal.caidin at apereo.org
> Skype: nealkdin
> Twitter: ncaidin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 9, 2013, at 10:11 AM, Aaron Zeckoski <azeckoski at unicon.net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Mark J. Norton
> <markjnorton at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> Still, I'd like to see some architectural review done.  Perhaps we should
> build support for TinCan into the kernel.  We might consider support for a
>
>
> Good idea, already done in trunk.
> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/KNL-1042
>
>
> button support, for example).  We should move up to Java 7, too.
>
>
> Same as above... but in 2.9.
> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-20908
>
> -AZ
>
> --
> Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>
>



-- 
Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile