[sakai2-tcc] Infrastructure discussion for future meeting?

[Berg, Alan]

I like Chucks idea of going into the conference with the list. Smells like a meaningful deliverable and I like deliverables encoded in emails.

 Let shine the lights. Even consider putting expertise by types of problem.  We are then on the way to the discussion about who is responsible for guarding which edible chunk.




Regards,
           Alan


Alan Berg

Innovation working group
On the use of ICT in Education & Research
University of Amsterdam
________________________________
From: sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] on behalf of Charles Severance [csev at umich.edu]
Sent: 12 March 2013 17:06
To: sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org Committee
Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] Infrastructure discussion for future meeting?

I like the list and agree that the list is not hard to construct.  We all know our weaknesses.  And of course the product while imperfect does function so there is no need ot panic - but it would be good to flesh out these issues, write them down in a common place and then  add detail.

The problem with lists like this is that we make the list, call it a "roadmap" and then "stakeholders" (i.e. people with desires but no resources) get unhappy because there is never any progress on these things due to lack of resources and then decide an oversight committee of "fans of Sakai" would fix every thing - and that just makes it worse.

But we do need to break tat cycle - and not talking about this stuff does not break the cycle.

So here is my proposal.  Lets make a confluence page called "Important Unfunded Mandate List" and put this stuff there and then add detail and even prioritize them and even meet about this from time to time (including San Diego).

By calling it the "Important Unfunded Mandate List" we *emphasize* that resources are needed and until resources arrive no progress will be made.  And then if those "hypothetical" folks who want give resources (I always doubt these really exist) at least have a list of unfunded mandates that could use some funding.   We also could even have a (perhaps less public) list of folks who would be willing to take those projects on for money and who are plenty skilled to take the effort on.

This could be solved by proper labeling.

I attach "Chuck's Scary List" from December 2004 that was mistakenly sent to the dev list instead of the board list and resulted in Lleida doing the translations for Sakai 2.0.  Sadly some of the things are still open issues.

/Chuck

_______________________________________________
sakai2-tcc mailing list
sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai2-tcc/attachments/20130312/30b5ecac/attachment.html