[sakai2-tcc] Infrastructure discussion for future meeting?

[Jean-Francois Leveque]

I'm afraid the last part smells really bad.

What does the incubation say about tools that are already in core and 
don't meet the standards?

I think we should work to raise the standards globally, I don't think 
setting a frontier will help.

Cheers,
J-F

On 08/03/2013 02:56, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
...
>
> All the incubation process seeks to do is gather all of that and
> formalise it so that people wanting to get an existing tool into a
> sponsored state (e.g in to the core of CLE) know what standards need to
> be met in order for that to happen.
>
> cheers,
> Steve
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Charles Severance <csev at umich.edu
> <mailto:csev at umich.edu>> wrote:
>
>
>     On Mar 7, 2013, at 2:57 PM, Noah Botimer wrote:
>
>>     But as far the CLE is concerned, I find the actual, present,
>>     technical and coordination demands within our project of much more
>>     interest. I don't think we have to wait for anything.
>
>     I talked extensively and directly with Ian about how incubation
>     would affect Sakai.  I reminded him that during merger negotiations
>     two years ago, incubation was characterized as additional resources
>     rather than additional hoops or additional paperwork or some new
>     authority layer.  He agreed and told me not to worry about
>     incubation being a barrier to Sakai forward process.
>
>     I believe Ian.  So I have stopped worrying about it.   I am not
>     wasting my time thinking about incubation *at all*.
>
>     /Chuck