[sakai2-tcc] code review process/software

May, Megan Marie mmmay at indiana.edu
Fri Jun 28 07:43:23 PDT 2013


I agree that is a good approach.   

-----Original Message-----
From: sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] On Behalf Of Neal Caidin
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 10:18 AM
To: Seth Theriault
Cc: sakai2-tcc Committee
Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] code review process/software

I agree. 

I just pinged the TCC Chair/ Vice Chair for some guidance on this (for me :-) ). I think a coordinated and informed effort is the way to go. Maybe a sub-group of a few of us to just "make it happen"? 

Thinking out loud. 

Thanks,
Neal


On Jun 28, 2013, at 10:12 AM, Seth Theriault <slt at columbia.edu> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Neal Caidin <neal.caidin at apereo.org> wrote:
>> I am the contact for our hosting provider Wush.net . It seems like 
>> Wush might also be able to help us with this too. I imagine I would 
>> be a logical contact for Atlassian. Probably good to have at least two backups for every service. Not good to have a single point of failure.
> 
> Isn't our real problem with Crucible that our codebase is "too big"
> for Atlassian to handle on their hosted infrastructure? I seem to 
> remember Matt Jones talking about this at the Apereo Infrastructure 
> meeting/discussion and elsewhere in San Diego.
> 
>> I remember something about a hosting provider that Apereo Ja-Sig 
>> folks thought were full of awesomeness that can host these kinds of 
>> systems too. I've been happy with Wush, but if Infrastructure decides 
>> to consolidate providers, then the timing/cost considerations should tie in with that (provided there is a reaonable timeline?).
> 
> Jasig's hosting provider for Atlassian stuff is, I believe, the same 
> group that handles Atlassian's hosted service and their reputation is 
> stellar (just ask Eric Dalquist). Consolidation of back-end 
> infrastructure -- especially the hosting of Atlassian instances -- is 
> squarely on the future agenda, but no one is rushing.
> 
> Perhaps we should get some clarification/more detail from Matt and 
> others before we run out and redo all of this again. It needs to be a 
> coordinated and informed effort.
> 
> Seth

_______________________________________________
sakai2-tcc mailing list
sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc


More information about the sakai2-tcc mailing list