[sakai2-tcc] code review process/software

[Neal Caidin]

I think the way to deal with that is to come up with a decision/plan and run it by the infrastructure group before proceeding.  If there are budget/cost needs, we should identify those too. Possibly the Atlassian hold-up is because it is a free service so harder to get their attention (just a guess)?


-- Neal

On Jun 28, 2013, at 7:41 AM, Aaron Zeckoski <azeckoski at unicon.net> wrote:

> Makes sense to me, but as discussed in the TCC meeting at the
> conference, something needs to be put in place and I don't want to see
> this topic continue to have no actions taken.
> -AZ
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Neal Caidin <neal.caidin at apereo.org> wrote:
>> Apereo is undergoing an infrastructure review across projects. On We should, at a minimum see what is going on with that before making any final decision.
>> 
>> 2 cents.
>> 
>> -- Neal
>> 
>> 
>> On Jun 28, 2013, at 7:07 AM, Aaron Zeckoski <azeckoski at unicon.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> That code was reviewed by multiple people. That said, I am all for
>>> looking at a code review program of some kind. The last time this was
>>> discussed just before the conference, I think someone was checking
>>> with our atlassian provider about hooking up crucible. I am not sure
>>> what the status of that is now though.
>>> 
>>> -AZ
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Steve Swinsburg
>>> <steve.swinsburg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>> With the recent gradebook bug that was merged to the maintenance branch that
>>>> caused an incompatibility, I think we have a good case for moving forward
>>>> with some sort of code review software so we can get more eyes on fixes
>>>> before they are committed. We need it work for merges also.
>>>> 
>>>> My preference is to accelerate a move to github and use the tools there
>>>> however its more complex as we need to maintain SVN as well (though could be
>>>> synchronised and made read only).
>>>> 
>>>> We use reviewboard at work and it works well, but I'm hesitant about using
>>>> it here as it adds extra steps and more overhead.
>>>> 
>>>> Whatever solution it needs to be automatic IMO.
>>>> 
>>>> What are other peoples thoughts on tools?
>>>> 
>>>> cheers,
>>>> Steve
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> sakai2-tcc mailing list
>>>> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sakai2-tcc mailing list
>>> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile