[sakai2-tcc] RESULT: Proposal to include Antisamy in 2.9.2

[May, Megan Marie]

Just returning to the office now.    Sounds like it's time to move forward

From: Sam Ottenhoff [mailto:ottenhoff at longsight.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 10:26 PM
To: Seth Theriault
Cc: May, Megan Marie; sakai2-tcc Committee
Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] RESULT: Proposal to include Antisamy in 2.9.2


On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Seth Theriault <slt at columbia.edu<mailto:slt at columbia.edu>> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Sam Ottenhoff <ottenhoff at longsight.com<mailto:ottenhoff at longsight.com>> wrote:

> Now that 2.9.2 is out, I think we should move to default enabled to get more
> testing and in preparation for default enabled as part of 2.9.3.
>
> We have been running clients with AntiSamy enabled in production for two
> months now.  AntiSamy has been enabled by default in trunk for more than two
> months.
Is everyone running with default settings (i.e., simply enabling
Antisamy)? Or are there custom rules in use and further tweaking is
required beyond what is in trunk?

Seth

We are using the default rules that are in trunk (and 2.9.x) with the AntiSamy low setting.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai2-tcc/attachments/20130617/285936c4/attachment.html