[sakai2-tcc] Sakai CLE survey

[Neal Caidin]

I would say that what you are describing seems based on an official release tag. Probably most institutions add fixes, extra tools or update tools. An example of the custom/other I think would be what Rutgers did, when they took a non-official release tag of 2.9 and based their instance on that. I think Rice did the same thing.

Maybe the wording should say:

What type of Sakai release will your upgrade be based on?

-- Neal

On Jan 17, 2013, at 5:28 AM, Jean-Francois Leveque <jean-francois.leveque at upmc.fr> wrote:

> I only have one question.
> 
> On 16/01/2013 22:40, Anthony Whyte wrote:
>> Suggested edits to last year's survey:
>> 
> 
> ...
> 
>> 
>> 5. What type of Sakai release do you use? --> When you perform your next
>> Sakai CLE upgrade, what code will you use?
>> Official release tag (e.g. 2.6.3, 2.7.1, 2.8.2, 2.9.0, etc.)
>> Maintenance branch code (e.g. 2.7.x, 2.8.x, etc.)
>> Other (trunk, custom local build, custom SCA build)
>> 
>> Note: the original question sets up a false equivalency between the
>> options. Maintenance branch or "other" code is not the same as tagged
>> release code.
> 
> If the code I use is based on an official release tag but I add fixes, 
> extra tools, or update tools, how much change is needed to make it a 
> "custom local build" Other ?
> 
> ...
> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Anth
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> J-F
> 
>> On Jan 16, 2013, at 2:39 PM, Charles Severance wrote:
>> 
>>> Yes - this is a good idea. It should be the Sakai CLE survey.
>>> 
>>> /Chuck
>>> 
>>> On Jan 16, 2013, at 1:32 PM, Aaron Zeckoski wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Sounds good to me.
>>>> -AZ
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Neal Caidin
>>>> <nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org
>>>> <mailto:nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org>> wrote:
>>>>> Based on TCC discussion today, I would presume the best course of
>>>>> action is
>>>>> to remove OAE from the survey this time around (as an option for
>>>>> upgrading
>>>>> instead of, or hybrid to CLE). Agreed?
>>>>> 
>>>>> If so, then just a couple of minor questions and the survey will be
>>>>> ready
>>>>> for TCC review and community consumption.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Neal
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc