[sakai2-tcc] More on Institutional Acknowledgements

[Beth Kirschner]

Are we doing Sakai Fellows this year? If yes, a PPT slide with acknowledgements around the same time of announcing the fellows seems like a good time.

- Beth

On Apr 10, 2013, at 10:26 AM, Neal Caidin <nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org> wrote:

> Hi TCC,
> 
> I do not yet have a proposal. Working on a strawperson for institutional acknowledgements between July 2012 - June 2013. Would that be a good date range to pick? Another open question is how to publish the acknowledgements. For example: web page, Open Apereo conference (not a presentation, more like projection between sessions, etc), letter to CIOs, etc. And a question of whether individual acknowledgements are also appropriate and, if so, where are they appropriate and what are the threshold contributions for these?  
> 
> Here are contributions that I think should be acknowledged. Among the challenges for this kind of recognition are what is the threshold for quality and quantity of contribution to these tasks. 
> 
> Tasks in alphabetical order:
> 
> Accessibility issue reporting and fixing
> Branch Management
> CLE Release team participation and bug fixing and patch review
> Code contributions and patches
> Community outreach ( use cases, pamplets, conference planning, etc)
> Documentation ( includes Confluence, Sakai properties, etc)
> Early adopter of 2.9
> Internationalization issue reporting and fixing
> Jira Triage
> Load testing
> Localizations (Translations)
> Participation on Email lists
> QA planning
> QA testing
> Release Management
> Security Pen Testing
> Security Testing
> TCC membership
> Tool specific development or enhancements (including bug fixes)  - [Lessons, Samigo, etc]
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Thanks,
> Neal
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc