[sakai2-tcc] [cle-kernel-team] [cle-release-team] retiring the kernel team

[Charles Severance]

I am for retiring the concept of the kernel team as a "structural entity" with rules and procedures.  It should be run like any other group of committers (i.e. like portal).   The kernel committer group can decide how to work (i.e. meetings, etc... or just email ... )

It is OK to have/keep an kernel email list if folks want it.   If we have a kernel email list it should be like the TCC list (i.e. anyone can join and anyone can post).  I doubt the kernel committers need a private lst - for the portal when we want to talk about a new committer - simply mailing the other existing committers directly is enough.   No need for a private list for 2 messages per year.

/Chuck

On Jun 19, 2012, at 8:28 AM, Seth Theriault wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Berg, Alan <A.M.Berg at uva.nl> wrote:
>> Yes resources are scarce and so keep to message.
> 
> The Git v. Subversion can because it's simply distracting. Let's focus
> on getting a reasonable code review + committers for Kernel and see
> how that goes (that's essentially what is happening anyway). I am +1
> on waiting to get 2.9 out the door.
> 
> Seth

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai2-tcc/attachments/20120619/2e8bed54/attachment.html