[sakai2-tcc] Agenda - Re: Invitations sent for TCC - CLECC meeting this week

[Matthew Jones]

I'd say most of the current CLE *is* code that has been slipped in that
hasn't been reviewed other than by the person who committed it. And we
could probably use at least 3-5 more developers full time to get it up to
some reasonable level of understanding, though that's the count of the ones
either just lost to OAE years ago or lost in general.

Most of these tools should really just be replaced but there isn't enough
developers out there working on existing code, let alone new getting new
code in, and many of the possible replacements have some reason or another
why they aren't up for consideration.

Unless of course you mean to review all of this yourself and get this all
up to some undefined criteria. I don't think you'll get too much assistance
as everyone else is just trying to keep things running.

Over the last 6 months these are the people who have committed 30 changes
or more to the Sakai CLE, excluding msub and branches. The only person I
can think of that regularly submits patches and might be on this list is
Yuki Yamada.

steve.swinsburg at gmail 181
matthew at longsight 110
hedrick at rutgers 100
a.fish at lancaster 71
gsilver at umich 65
ottenhoff at longsight 61
david.horwitz at uct 57
azeckoski at unicon 50
zqian at umich 43
holladay at longsight 41
ktsao at stanford 30


On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Anthony Whyte <arwhyte at umich.edu> wrote:

> Equating CLE modules with fully-fledged projects in the JA-SIG mold would,
> in many cases, be inappropriate.  Given this, generating separate
> checklists for each in a manner similar to or inspired by the JA-SIG
> incubation process is not much of a value add in my view. [1]
>
> Anth
>
> [1] https://wiki.jasig.org/display/INCU/Incubation+Process
>
>
> On Dec 11, 2012, at 5:38 PM, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
>
> Yes, could be a lot of work, however I think its important that all
> modules meet the criteria for the new Foundation and we don't have code
> slipping in that has never been reviewed. It should just be a checklist
> that can be walked though. At least then we know the state of each.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:26 AM, May, Megan Marie <mmmay at indiana.edu>wrote:
>
>>  All modules?   That sounds like quite the effort****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:
>> sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Steve
>> Swinsburg
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 11, 2012 5:19 PM
>> *To:* Seth Theriault
>> *Cc:* sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org 2
>> *Subject:* Re: [sakai2-tcc] Agenda - Re: Invitations sent for TCC -
>> CLECC meeting this week****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> RE incubation, the Apereo board is working through a document about how
>> we think incubation might work and what its goals are. We should have more
>> to report soon. ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> In any case, yes, there will be an incubation process, how it relates to
>> the CLE and other existing projects is being discussed. My initial thoughts
>> are for a review of all modules of CLE for code debt, areas for
>> enhancements and maintenance/support, rather than just grandfathering it
>> all in.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Seth Theriault <slt at columbia.edu> wrote:
>> ****
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Neal Caidin
>> <nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> > We may not cover all this, but here is a brain dump of things that need
>> > attention.****
>>
>> [...]****
>>
>> > - Transition to Apereo - nothing to report at the moment , but something
>> > that should be on the radar screen. I'm getting a new Apereo email
>> address
>> > soon.****
>>
>> I may not make tomorrow's meeting, so here's a comment. In theory,
>> there is supposed to be a "lightweight" incubation process for the CLE
>> and the other Jasig/Sakai top-level projects. I am pretty sure the
>> existing Jasig Incubation group was spearheading this, but there seem
>> to be few details about this that have been publicly communicated
>> apart from the meeting notes:
>>
>> https://wiki.jasig.org/display/INCU/Meetings
>>
>> If anyone out there has more info (Steve S.?), I'd love to hear it.
>>
>> Seth
>> _______________________________________________
>> sakai2-tcc mailing list
>> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai2-tcc/attachments/20121211/51f2a084/attachment-0001.html