[sakai2-tcc] Enhancement branch merge policy (end period) clarification

[csev]

Not wanting to distract the main point of conversation too much,  I do think that we need to have a solid common understanding of this type of governance before our LA TCC beauty pageant :)

I like how Megan characterizes things.   The TCC is not the first or primary point of contact - the CLE is owned by the community.   The TCC is there to make sure that if a decision seems to go round and round, that we have a small, focused group that can make yes/no decisions.  The TCC is there so we eventually make progress if community consensus leads to being stuck.

/Chuck

On May 23, 2011, at 1:21 PM, May, Megan Marie wrote:

> I disagree that the tcc should be the primary contact.    These are changes that impact the community and as such, the greater community should be the primary point for consultation.      Yes, the TCC should be providing oversight but I believe that is something that can be done from the wings.  
>  
> Putting the TCC was the primary contact doesn’t seems to encourage the broader type of collaboration that the community needs.
>  
> That’s my 2 cents.
> Megan  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai2-tcc/attachments/20110523/f42c83ad/attachment.html