[sakai2-tcc] draft statement on end of support for Oracle 9

David Horwitz david.horwitz at uct.ac.za
Fri Jul 15 00:21:30 PDT 2011


+1

On 07/15/2011 01:10 AM, Anthony Whyte wrote:
> +1
>
> This says it all:
>
>>
>> > I will clarify that "the end of formal support" means "no longer
>> > assuring that future versions work on it by QA testing, etc."
>
>
> On Jul 14, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Matthew Jones wrote:
>
>> As of 2 weeks ago umich is on 11g and we won't even have 10g 
>> available much longer as that is also EOL, so I'm + 1 (g).
>>
>> On Jul 14, 2011 6:21 PM, "Seth Theriault" <slt at columbia.edu 
>> <mailto:slt at columbia.edu>> wrote:
>> > Seth Theriault wrote:
>> >
>> >> As discussed in Los Angeles, we should consider officially
>> >> dropping support for Oracle 9 and lower as of Sakai 2.8.1 (and
>> >> 2.7.2).
>> >>
>> >> Some reasons for this include:
>> >>
>> >> - Oracle 9 has been EOL'd for at least a year.
>> >> - In at least one case, our conversion scripts use SQL directives 
>> that are only available in Oracle 10 and later
>> >> - Institutions supporting QA servers no longer use Oracle 9
>> >>
>> >> I propose the following statement be adopted:
>> >>
>> >> "The Sakai CLE Technical Coordination Committee announces the end
>> >> of formal support for Oracle 9.2 and earlier, starting with the
>> >> release of the upcoming 2.8.1 and 2.7.2 maintenance releases.
>> >>
>> >> Oracle 9.2 reached the end of its formal "Extend Support"
>> >> coverage in July 2010. In addition, many institutions in the
>> >> Sakai community are using more recent versions of Oracle,
>> >> including all of those hosting Sakai QA servers for community
>> >> use. Finally, some of the current Oracle conversion scripts use
>> >> features that are only available in later versions."
>> >>
>> >> Let's discuss this for a week or so. We probably have to confirm
>> >> some of the above, but you get the geenral idea.
>> >
>> > Well, it's been a week and no one had ventured an opinion or
>> > thought. Anyone have objections to this somewhat
>> > non-controversial proposal?
>> >
>> > I will clarify that "the end of formal support" means "no longer
>> > assuring that future versions work on it by QA testing, etc."
>> >
>> > Seth
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > sakai2-tcc mailing list
>> > sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org 
>> <mailto:sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org>
>> > http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>> _______________________________________________
>> sakai2-tcc mailing list
>> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org 
>> <mailto:sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org>
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai2-tcc/attachments/20110715/f35496f7/attachment.html 


More information about the sakai2-tcc mailing list