[sakai2-tcc] Cleaning up versions in Jira

[Steve Swinsburg]

Whilst I agree with having issues lined up against the actual release so as to give better reporting, there is an edge case where an issue has no tag associated with it:

Example:

https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-20824

I fixed yesterday. The tool is deprecated and will not be released (but a client is still using it). It's poms are at 2.8-SNAPSHOT (ie 2.8.x), even though it is trunk. It doesn't need to be brought into line with the rest of the versions because it is a dodo. In this case, it actually makes more sense to leave the fix version at 2.8.x

cheers,
Steve



On 09/07/2011, at 1:09 AM, Jean-Francois Leveque wrote:

> Versions that are or will be tags (tentative).
> 
> J-F
> 
> On 08/07/2011 17:01, May, Megan Marie wrote:
>> Could someone explain what these issues are being updated to?
>> 
>> Megan
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] On Behalf Of Jean-Francois Leveque
>> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 7:59 AM
>> To: sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org; Steve Swinsburg; zach at aeroplanesoftware.com; csev; Zhen Qian; Anthony Whyte
>> Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] Cleaning up versions in Jira
>> 
>> Hi Dave,
>> 
>> About the 2.8.x in Fix Version/s, I've sent a mail to the assignees of SAK-20824, SAK-19689, SAK-19494 and SAK-14860 to request an update of the Fix Version/s with Cc to you, David.
>> 
>> I've checked the Affects with 2.8.x and updated part of them. If we now ignore the issues for components Release Management and Maven, we only have 7 remaining issues right now and I don't think an update for those is really needed.
>> 
>> My opinion about 2.7.x has not changed so far because I haven't reviewed the related issues.
>> 
>> My opinion about 2.8.x is now, you get a +1 if you wait until July 18th morning UCT time. You can do it earlier if SAK-20824, SAK-19689,
>> SAK-19494 and SAK-14860 have all been updated.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> J-F
>> 
>> On 06/07/2011 15:34, David Horwitz wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>> 
>>> As discussed in LA we suggested getting rid of the x versions, so
>>> unless I hear otherwise I will archive the following versions:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> - 2.6.x
>>> -2.7.x
>>> -2.8.x
>>> 
>>> Archiving means that issues that where tagged as affecting or fixed in
>>> those versions will still display this, however those versions will no
>>> longer appear in the dropdowns.
>>> 
>>> I would also suggest we archive the 2.5 versions:
>>> 2.5.0
>>> 2.5.1
>>> 2.5.2
>>> 2.5.3
>>> 2.5.4
>>> 2.5.5
>>> 2.5.6
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Any objections?
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> 
>>> David