[sakai2-tcc] VOTE: Adoption of 2.9 Release Schedule

[May, Megan Marie]

+1

-----Original Message-----
From: sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] On Behalf Of Steve Swinsburg
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 7:56 PM
To: Beth Kirschner
Cc: sakai2-tcc Committee
Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] VOTE: Adoption of 2.9 Release Schedule

+1

On 16/08/2011, at 5:41 AM, Beth Kirschner wrote:

> +1
> 
> On Aug 15, 2011, at 3:34 PM, Beth Kirschner wrote:
> 
>> Having not received any further discussion, I'd like to open this issue for a vote, with the voting OPEN until Friday, August 19th at 23:59 UTC.
>> 
>> As a reminder, this is a public, on-list vote with a "+1" signifying approval. Per our governance documents, a -1 vote must be accompanied by a detailed explanation. A single -1 vote based on a material objection will block action. However, -1 blocking votes can be overridden by a 2/3 majority roll call vote of active TCC members.
>> 
>> - Beth
>> 
>> On Aug 10, 2011, at 9:29 AM, Beth Kirschner wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Jean-Francois,
>>> 
>>> I'm still not clear on the specifics of what you're asking, but if you're suggesting a different format (perhaps a graphical representation of the timeline?), then I think you should feel free to put something together and we could post that on the release schedule page as well.
>>> 
>>> - Beth
>>> 
>>> On Aug 10, 2011, at 3:54 AM, Jean-Francois Leveque wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I'd be delighted if it was more readable for me.
>>>> 
>>>>> I'm only asking for changes that will make things easier to read for me. If I want to know which activities have started, I check past and current months start date column. If I want to know which activities should be over, I check past and current months due date column.
>>>>> 
>>>>> If an activity runs starts and is due in different months, we could add (start) to the activity label with start date as only date in the start month and (due) to the activity label with due date as only date.
>>>> 
>>>> What do others think ?
>>>> 
>>>> J-F
>>>> 
>>>> On 09/08/2011 23:28, Beth Kirschner wrote:
>>>>> At the LA Project Coordination Meetings a  release schedule that closely mirrors that of 2.8.0 was proposed for the 2.9.0 release and the consensus was to move forward with this recommendation. The schedule  is detailed at  https://confluence.sakaiproject.org/x/VIiCB and has been circulated to the community for comment.  Based on previous discussions, I've gone ahead and moved up the String Freeze date to coincide with the Code Freeze date. I'd like to put it to a vote next week, but please share any concerns or questions now.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> - Beth
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> sakai2-tcc mailing list
>>>> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sakai2-tcc mailing list
>>> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> sakai2-tcc mailing list
>> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc

_______________________________________________
sakai2-tcc mailing list
sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc