[sakai2-tcc] ROLL CALL VOTE: override objections to retaining Hybrid patches in Login and Providers

John Bush john.bush at rsmart.com
Fri Nov 5 14:26:13 PDT 2010


YES

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Anthony Whyte <arwhyte at umich.edu> wrote:

> Two TCC members have objected to retaining in 2.8.x two hybrid-related
> patches to login and providers that, in my opinion, are low risk additions
> that help simplify adding the hybrid module to a 2.8 build.
>
> As I noted in my previous email I believe it important that we avoid
> erecting barriers to those who wish to pursue the evolving hybrid approach
> between the CLE and OLE--removing the patches will add additional steps to
> those who wish to deploy the hybrid 1.0 module, a scenario that benefits no
> one.
>
> 1. Neither patch is active by default
> 2. No Nakamura dependencies are added to 2.8 (Lance has refactored Hybrid
> removing Nakamura dependencies)
> 3. No precedent set here (mirrors what we did for GB2 in 2.7)
> 4. The patches help simplify adding the hybrid module to a 2.8 installation
> 5. Hybrid itself is packaged as an indie and the project is
> well-maintained.  Any additional documentation required will be cheerfully
> generated by Lance.
> 6. Where we can assist our OAE colleagues we should; this is a modest step
> towards greater collaboration.
>
>
> MOTION
>
> This is a public, on-list vote on the following question:
>
> "Shall the TCC override objections to retaining the inclusion of hybrid
> patches to login (SAK-17223) and providers (SAK-17222) that were merged to
> 2.8.x for inclusion in the upcoming sakai-2.8.0 release."
>
>
> VOTING
>
> Active TCC members will vote "YES" or "NO" where "YES" is a vote
> to override the -1 blocker vote and approve the Hybrid patches proposal for
> inclusion in 2.8.
>
> Voting is OPEN now until 20:00 UTC, WEDNESDAY, 10 NOV 2010.
>
>
> CODE (PLEASE REVIEW IT)
>
> Providers:
> https://source.sakaiproject.org/svn/providers/branches/sakai-2.8.x/hybrid/
> Login:
> https://source.sakaiproject.org/svn/login/branches/sakai-2.8.x/login-tool/tool/src/java/org/sakaiproject/login/filter/NakamuraAuthenticationFilter.java
>
>
> PATCH JIRAS
>
> Hybrid UserDirectoryProvider http://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-17222
> Hybrid container AuthN filter
> http://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-17223
>
>
> HYBRID PROJECT
>
> http://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/HYB
>
> Open/resolved HYB jiras:
>
> http://jira.sakaiproject.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+HYB
>
>
> EARLIER DISCUSSIONS
>
> Lance's answers to questions raised about Hybrid prior to the TCC vote to
> exclude Hybrid from 2.8.0
>
>
> http://confluence.sakaiproject.org/display/TCC/2.8.0+Inclusion+Voting+Tally+and+Comments
>
> http://confluence.sakaiproject.org/display/TCC/List+of+Planned+2.8.0+Changes
>
>
> RECENT CONCERNS:
>
>
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai2-tcc/2010-October/000524.html
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Anth
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From: *Anthony Whyte <arwhyte at umich.edu>
> *Date: *October 15, 2010 11:36:04 AM EDT
> *To: *"sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org Committee" <
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org>
> *Subject: **[sakai2-tcc] SAK-19326: hybrid removal / patch retention*
>
> I've removed the hybrid module assembly dependency from the 2.8.x
> core-deploy pom as well as the version <property> in the master pom.  I have
> not reverted the patches to login and providers (SAK-17222, SAK-17223) as
> myself and others believe retaining the patches will simplify the
> installation and deployment process for deployers who wish to add hybrid to
> their 2.8 installations.  There is certainly precedent for this approach;
> most recently we provided "hooks" for gradebook2 in sakai-2.7.
>
> I suggest we leave them in place for inclusion in the upcoming
> sakai-2.8.0-a02 QA tag.  I believe it important that we avoid erecting
> barriers to those who wish to pursue the evolving hybrid approach between 2x
> and the Sakai OAE--removing the patches will add additional steps to those
> who wish to deploy the hybrid 1.0 module, a scenario that benefits no one.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Anthony
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>
>


-- 
John Bush
602-490-0470
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai2-tcc/attachments/20101105/db250b3b/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the sakai2-tcc mailing list