[sakai2-tcc] VOTE on 2.8 timeline (SHORTENED period)

[Jean-Francois Leveque]

Just thought it could be frozen at the same time as the code.

We'll see what happens this time.

J-F

May, Megan Marie a écrit :
> My thinking is that the strings aren't all going to change on that last day.   Also, it's mostly the responsibility of the project teams to update help doc right?   as long as the teams making those changes are aware that the help documentation needs to be updated at the same time that should work. 
> 
> Isn't the important thing that this content is frozen so translations occur?
> 
> Megan
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] On Behalf Of Jean-Francois Leveque
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 12:06 PM
> To: sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] VOTE on 2.8 timeline (SHORTENED period)
> 
> I think this late String Freeze will go wrong and do not understand how 
> you can end help doc at the same time as the string freeze.
> 
> Upgrading my -1 to 0 with those changes in order not to get the process 
> stuck even if I'm not confident with it.
> 
> J-F
> 
> May, Megan Marie a écrit :
>> It was my impression that most of the TCC thought that a string freeze at code freeze wasn't realistic but maybe I am mistaken.  
>>
>>
>> Here's is a compromise: 
>> * String Freeze - stays as Nov 5. Changes are less and less frequent up to this date.   
>> * Help Doc - Move to Nov 5 to match String Freeze
>> * Translations merges done 2011-01-25 (Matches tagging date) 
>>
>>
>> What do you think?  We need to have this schedule set and circulated ASAP. 
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] On Behalf Of Jean-Francois Leveque
>> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 10:19 AM
>> To: sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] VOTE on 2.8 timeline (SHORTENED period)
>>
>> NP, can write something down.
>>
>> String Freeze at Code Freeze 2010-09-21. We can accept fixes through RM 
>> supervision this time with notification to the i18n/L10n list.
>>
>> Default help documentation due 2010-11-05 (Code Freeze + 45 days).
>>
>> Translations merges done 2011-01-28 (release - 30 days, back 2 days to 
>> Friday). Availability of translations for merge may need planning 
>> depending on resources for merging translations.
>>
>> May, Megan Marie a écrit :
>>> FWIW, at the meeting the thought was not to distinguishing between indie/non-indie/kernel.    
>>>
>>> As for string freeze, we acknowledged that it wasn't as early as we'd like but needed to be later for 2.8 if we're going to release by March 1.  I'd like a little more elaboration on your -1.   Can you tell us concrete dates for code freeze / string freeze / documentation / translation timing?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] On Behalf Of Jean-Francois Leveque
>>> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 4:51 AM
>>> To: sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>> Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] VOTE on 2.8 timeline (SHORTENED period)
>>>
>>> -1
>>>
>>> I still disagree with the code freeze / string freeze / documentation / 
>>> translation timing.
>>>
>>> Think indies should be ready no later than the non-indie part.
>>>
>>> J-F
>>>
>>> Seth Theriault a écrit :
>>>> May, Megan Marie wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The schedule for 2.8 release activity has been updated to 
>>>>> reflect comments collected as well as the discussion from 
>>>>> Wednesday.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is available at 
>>>>> http://confluence.sakaiproject.org//x/8RkhB.
>>>>>
>>>>> I propose we vote to adopt this timeline.
>>>> The motion is seconded (by your chair) and is now OPEN for
>>>> voting. The vote will remain open until 23:59 UTC on Monday,
>>>> August 23, 2010.
>>>>
>>>> NOTE: In the interest of time and given the significant 
>>>> previous discussion, the voting period is SHORTER than usual.
>>>>
>>>> As a reminder, this is a public, on-list vote with a "+1" 
>>>> signifying "adoption of the 2.8 timeline as proposed."
>>>>
>>>> Per our governance documents, a -1 vote must be accompanied by
>>>> a detailed explanation. A single -1 vote based on a material
>>>> objection will block action. However, -1 blocking votes can be
>>>> overridden by a 2/3 majority roll call vote of active TCC
>>>> members.
>>>>
>>>> Seth