[sakai2-tcc] Draft: TCC governance

May, Megan Marie mmmay at indiana.edu
Mon Aug 2 08:13:18 PDT 2010


I agree with Anthony 

-----Original Message-----
From: sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:sakai2-tcc-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Whyte
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 11:13 AM
To: Jean-Francois Leveque
Cc: sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
Subject: Re: [sakai2-tcc] Draft: TCC governance

2 weeks is a lifetime.  We need to be agile.  3 work days max is what I would recommend.  That allows for 5 days over a weekend.


Anth


On Aug 2, 2010, at 10:08 AM, Jean-Francois Leveque wrote:

> Seconding Seth's change proposal
> 
> Otherwise, +1.
> 
> Maybe we need something like:
> 1/3 approval votes without any disapproval in at least 2 weeks is an approval
> 
> Seth Theriault a écrit :
>> Anthony Whyte wrote:
>>> 1.5 TCC member (inactive, emeritus)
>>> 
>>> If a TCC member fails to participate actively in the work of the TCC over a 12 month period or is unable participate in TCC work due to other responsibilities, they will be accorded emeritus status and their binding vote will be suspended.  Changes in status from active to emeritus and from emeritus to active will be determined by a simple majority of active TCC members.
>> For clarity, I would explicitly say that these moves can be initiated by request of the TCC member concerned.
>> Otherwise, +1.
>> Seth
> 
> 



More information about the sakai2-tcc mailing list