[WG: Sakai QA] [samigo-team] [Important] SAM-973 for CLE 2.9.2 ?

Karen Tsao ktsao at stanford.edu
Thu May 2 10:02:16 PDT 2013


Hi Neal,

Can I know what has not fixed in this JIRA? I thought the issue is fixed?
Maybe I miss something?

Thanks,
Karen



On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Neal Caidin
<nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org>wrote:

> The CLE team did not identify this as one of the issues to get resolved
> for RC02 (to be honest, I didn't bring it up based on this thread :-p ).
>
> But we still have the original quesiton open about whether this should get
> merged into 2.9.x (after 2.9.2) and a new ticket opened with Fill in the
> Blank grading?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Neal
>
> On Apr 30, 2013, at 8:50 PM, Anthony Whyte <arwhyte at umich.edu> wrote:
>
> I see no problem with Neal or the QA team raising potential concerns, even
> between release candidates.  We've got a long standing ticket triage
> process in place on the release team plus two branch managers with long
> experience managing 2.9.x.
>
> Indeed, I find it both refreshing and encouraging that we can actually
> talk of the QA team as an actual entity doing good work.  Like Megan though
> I encourage everyone to consider carefully the cost/benefit to the
> community of delaying a release in order to pull in just one more
> non-blocking fix or a few more like it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Anth
>
>
> On Apr 30, 2013, at 8:31 PM, Neal Caidin wrote:
>
> Hi Megan,
>
> My thought process is one of gathering information, not making decisions.
> I think there are enough checks and balances in the process that hopefully
> your concerns can be allayed. I see these decisions as ultimately to be
> made by the CLE release team, correct?
>
> You've got a great point and I agree, I would not consider this a blocker
> for 2.9.2. Does that mean we should not consider adding it? There are a few
> more like this, where a bug fix has been made and verified in trunk, and it
> seems like "low hanging fruit" to merge it in and make 2.9.2 even a little
> better as we head towards rc02. I think rc02 is almost an inevitable need,
> btw. I can understand if you are worried about scope creep.
>
> I would prefer to bring these different issues up, especially as they are
> being brought to my attention by QA testers, and, like I said, gather
> information for input to the CLE release team. We can always choose to push
> the issues to 2.9.3 and then we will have a jump start having answered some
> questions and move some progress on these tickets.
>
> Regards,
> Neal
>
>
> On Apr 30, 2013, at 4:31 PM, "May, Megan Marie" <mmmay at indiana.edu> wrote:
>
> Neal,2****
>    I’m really, really, really, really concerned that bugs that are not
> flagged as **blockers**  keep being brought up as candidates for release.*
> ***
>
> SAM-973 has existed since 2.6.3 . . . why isn’t it being flagged for 2.9.3
> like some of the other issues that have been raised? ****
>
> Megan****
>
>
> *From:* samigo-team-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org [mailto:samigo-
> team-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Neal Caidin
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 30, 2013 4:18 PM
> *To:* Samigo Team
> *Cc:* sakai-qa at collab.sakaiproject.org QA;
> cle-release-team at collab.sakaiproject.org
> *Subject:* [samigo-team] [Important] SAM-973 for CLE 2.9.2 ?
> *Importance:* High****
> ** **
> Dear Samigo Team,****
> ** **
> The QA team reviewed opened Jiras that potentially need to be addressed
> for CLE 2.9.2 (and specifically to get into 2.9.2-rc02, release candidate
> 02).****
> ** **
> We have a question/suggestion for
> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAM-973****
> ** **
> We believe that SAM-973 is actually two issues. One is a GUI issue which
> has been fixed and verified in trunk. The GUI issue was sometimes
> displaying incorrect answers as though they were the correct answers (with
> green checkmarks). We think that this issue should have the 2.9.x merge
> flag set and be merged into 2.9.2-rc02.****
> ** **
> The other issue in SAM-973 is a problem with grading Fill in the Blank
> answers. This does not yet appear to be fixed and may or may not need
> additional discussion. For this one we suggest opening a separate ticket.
> ****
> ** **
> Does that make sense to you too? ****
> ** **
> Thanks!****
> ** **
> Neal Caidin****
>
> Sakai CLE Community Coordinator****
> nealcaidin at sakaifoundation.org****
> Skype: nealkdin****
> AIM: ncaidin at aol.com****
>
>
>
> ** **
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> samigo-team mailing list
> samigo-team at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/samigo-team
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> samigo-team mailing list
> samigo-team at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/samigo-team
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai-qa/attachments/20130502/4080c9ce/attachment.html 


More information about the sakai-qa mailing list