[WG: Sakai QA] Sakai QA] Code freeze exemption/2-7 merge request - Search

[Berg, A.M.]

Hi David,

>From the QA perspective:

(1) Seeing that we will only start testing properly from M2 the merge has no practical implications.
(2) While we should avoid unfreezing the freeze, exceptions can be entertained if third-party library updates include fixes that improve the quality of a Sakai release and do not disrupt the QA process.
(3) Upgrading libraries is normally a good idea in terms of quality

Therefore QA has no objections.

Alan

Alan Berg
Interim QA Director - The Sakai Foundation

Senior Developer / Quality Assurance
Group Education and Research Services
Central Computer Services
University of Amsterdam

http://home.uva.nl/a.m.berg




-----Original Message-----
From: sakai-qa-bounces at collab.sakaiproject.org on behalf of David Horwitz
Sent: Wed 11/25/2009 13:22
To: sakai-dev; sakai-qa
Subject: [WG: Sakai QA] Code freeze exemption/2-7 merge request - Search
 
Hi All,

I'd like to ask for a 2.7 code freeze exemption to merge 2 changes to
search before the next rc tag next week. They are both updates of to
versions of the apache libraries search is build on:

1) Upgrade to Lucene 2.9.1:
http://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-17450

2) Upgrade Tika to 0.5 and PDFBox to 0.8.0-incubating:
http://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-17140

Testing indicates these are both safe upgrades.

Regards

David
_______________________________________________
sakai-qa mailing list
sakai-qa at collab.sakaiproject.org
http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-qa

TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to sakai-qa-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai-qa/attachments/20091125/2473ab19/attachment.html