[sakai-pmc] Stack exchange site

[Steve Swinsburg]

I've approached the steering committees of the other major Apereo projects
(uPortal, CAS and Bedework) to see if they are interested in an Apereo wide
SE site - may be a few weeks before I hear back as they will need to
discuss. Its worth trying everything though, give the plugin a go and lets
see what it looks like.

I do like the openness and socialness (is that a word?) of the Stack
Exchange sites though. I think we can get some good exposure that way
rather than with confluence.

cheers,
Steve




On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:48 PM, <markjnorton at earthlink.net> wrote:

> I didn't see any further discussion on this topic.  Neal and I proposed
> the Confluence plugin approach in Miami.  Should we give that a try?
>
>
> - Mark Norton
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Jones
> Sent: Jun 7, 2014 8:27 PM
> To: Aaron Zeckoski
> Cc: "sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org"
> Subject: Re: [sakai-pmc] Stack exchange site
>
> Yeah, looking at the entire workflow, I think the bigger problem is the
> commitment phase. To actually get a site through to commitment phase you
> have to have the "minimum" of three scores
>
> - 200 total confirmed committers (up from the 60)
> - 100 of of the committers have to have 200+ rep on Stack Overflow
> - Some formula related to commitment score (
> http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/53650/area-51-commit-percent/53733#53733
> )
>
> Look at a topic like "Latin Language" that is only 50% through commitment
> with 100 committed (
> http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/48247/latin-language)
>
> Not to be pessimistic but I can't realistically see a Sakai only space
> getting that much activity. I think our only options are
> - The confluence plugin mentioned at the PMC meeting,
> - Suggesting people to post questions to regular Stack OverFlow with Sakai
> Tag and periodically watching the Sakai tag (
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/sakai). Participating with
> voting and answering is good for rep.
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Aaron Zeckoski <azeckoski at unicon.net>
> wrote:
>
>> We have 10 example questions so we need another 30 questions and about
>> 380 more votes (at a minimum). I still think the plan should be to get
>> the 40 questions (or maybe 45) in there first and then we will use the
>> dev list to get the votes in there.
>> -AZ
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Steve Swinsburg
>> <steve.swinsburg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Yep I've used up my questions and votes too. Everyone else if you can
>> pose
>> > some questions and vote up the others that would be good.
>> >
>> > sent from my mobile device
>> >
>> > On 07/06/2014 8:10 AM, "Aaron Zeckoski" <azeckoski at unicon.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Makes sense. Still worth the discussion but I'm dropping the
>> suggestion.
>> >> I maxed out my questions so we just need a few others to do the same.
>> >>
>> >> On Jun 6, 2014 5:15 PM, "Steve Swinsburg" <steve.swinsburg at gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Yeah I think we need to keep the projects separate. The other projects
>> >>> may not want to use this anyway.
>> >>>
>> >>> Also these are meant to be 40 example questions which then get voted
>> on
>> >>> to show we have a community. They don't need to be answered afaict. I
>> am
>> >>> unsure if they get transferred to the new community site.
>> >>>
>> >>> JFL we talked about this as an experiment to capture the technical
>> >>> questions that come up on the dev list since the good info can be
>> hard to
>> >>> find unless you remember the thread date/subject etc.
>> >>>
>> >>> If anyone down votes I propose they lose commit rights ;)
>> >>>
>> >>> Back in AU now.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers all.
>> >>> Steve
>> >>>
>> >>> sent from my mobile device
>> >>>
>> >>> On 07/06/2014 6:28 AM, "Charles Severance" <csev at umich.edu> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Jun 6, 2014, at 9:50 AM, Jean-Francois Leveque
>> >>>> <jean-francois.leveque at upmc.fr> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Could someone tell me why you want to create such a space wether i's
>> for
>> >>>> Sakai or Apereo?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I think that Sakai and CAS should be separate and there probably
>> should
>> >>>> not be an Apereo S.O.  There might be an ApereoOAE stackoverflow.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The foundation is a structure for intellectual property and shared
>> >>>> services - it is not the uber brand above each project.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> /Chuck
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> sakai-pmc mailing list
>> >>>> sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> >>>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-pmc
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> sakai-pmc mailing list
>> >>> sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> >>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-pmc
>> >>>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile
>> _______________________________________________
>> sakai-pmc mailing list
>> sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-pmc
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sakai-pmc mailing list
> sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-pmc
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai-pmc/attachments/20140611/0448fd36/attachment.html