[sakai-pmc] Update on Stack Overflow sites

[Steve Swinsburg]

Yep, just noticed they were gone too. Interesting experiment though.

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Matthew Jones <matthew at longsight.com>
wrote:
>
> It looks like both of these proposals have had no activity in a month and
> have been completely deleted. (Unless they were deleted for another reason).
>
> Probably best to stick with the idea of tagging questions or some other
> plan.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Neal Caidin <neal.caidin at apereo.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> Changing habits is hard. And I wasn't sure if the "pilot" had already
>> been completed or not, or if we should have continued to encourage posters.
>>
>> But if you think it is time to move towards using the general site with
>> the sakai tag, I will certainly support that effort and help with the
>> coordination. It would be cool if somehow this could be integrated with an
>> effort to improve technical documentation on Confluence (or outside of
>> Confluence) but those efforts seem to keep losing energy for some reason.
>>
>> 2 cents.
>>
>> Neal
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Steve Swinsburg <
>> steve.swinsburg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Two more months have passed and activity in the sites has stalled.
>>>
>>> IMHO opinion we might be able to get over the first hurdle, but I highly
>>> doubt we will get over the second, which requires vastly more committed
>>> people, so I'm tending towards ending this experiment and suggesting we
>>> post decent questions and answers to the general site with the sakai tag.
>>>
>>> It would be nice if this was coordinated so that we can spread the
>>> reputation love around though.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Steve
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Matthew Jones <matthew at longsight.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It looks like about 2-3 new people joined since then. Though what
>>>> either project really will need are people active in Stack Exchange who
>>>> would actually be active on this site, and not just people who click the
>>>> button. That is the bigger phase 2 hurdle when we get to the commitment
>>>> phase. Both Apereo and Sakai will probably get out of this first phase soon
>>>> without a problem. Someone without reputation across Stack Exchange counts
>>>> significantly less on phase 2 than someone who moderately active on some
>>>> other Stack Exchange site. To get out of the second phase we need 200 total
>>>> people, but 100 of them have to be somewhat active on other Stack Exchange
>>>> sites. (200+ rep at least)
>>>>
>>>> I was in a conference call today and was saying we could use some more
>>>> people and also talking up Stack Exchange. How there are a variety of
>>>> topics and you don't have to be a developer to be involved. Anyone also can
>>>> participate in topics of Academia, Travel, Russian Languages and Home
>>>> Improvement (to name a few), and looking at those other sites will be of
>>>> huge help now and if the site does get launched.
>>>>
>>>> Some of that was why we wanted people to put questions on Stack
>>>> Overflow and tag them with "Sakai". So we could at least build up some rep
>>>> there. But even with those Sakai questions I still have more rep on Arqade
>>>> (a video game Stack Exchange community) than Stack Overflow. ;)
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sakai-pmc mailing list
>>> sakai-pmc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-pmc
>>>
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai-pmc/attachments/20141219/de8fce9b/attachment.html