[sakai-pmc] PROPOSAL: svn cleanup

[Steve Swinsburg]

*Megan: *Thanks for the note. I'll wait to hear from UMich about that
project.

*Matt:* I was going to use svnadmin to do it but the easier option is to
just move them into a /svn/deprecated folder, so will do that for now.

*Cris:* The only ones are hybrid and pure-poms so in the interest of
simplicity, those will be dropped from this proposal and can be moved when
2.9 becomes unsupported. I dislike updating tags - if there is another 2.9
release they could possibly be adjusted then.

*Seth:* Is this a -1 to the whole proposal or just specific parts? We have
historically moved projects that are deprecated, but haven't for some time
(see the existing contrib/deprecated folder). This brings us up to date
with that practice.

cheers,
Steve


On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Seth Theriault <slt at columbia.edu> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Matthew Jones <matthew at longsight.com>
> wrote:
> > Rather than move them to contrib, which would lose the history unless
> we/you
> > use svnadmin to dump and reload into contrib (which you may or may not be
> > considering), perhaps keeping them in that repo and moving them all into
> > /svn/deprecated or /svn/msub/deprecated would be a better/easier idea.
>
> I don't see any real reasons to specifically move these projects to
> contrib. It just creates more work and ways to break things.
>
> Seth
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai-pmc/attachments/20131210/5d8b6229/attachment.html