[Building Sakai] [sakai-pmc] Feature for 10.3 ?
Neal Caidin
neal.caidin at apereo.org
Tue Nov 11 09:14:45 PST 2014
Hi Brian,
I think the best hope of getting this into 10.3 would be to disable by
default.
Would folks be comfortable if that was added?
Thanks,
Neal
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Brian Jones <bjones86 at uwo.ca> wrote:
> Yes, there are 3 new strings introduced:
>
> grading.anonymous=Anonymous grading
> grading.anonymous.title=anonymous
> submitted.date.redacted=(date withheld)
>
> There isn't yet a sakai.property to disable/not render the checkbox, but
> it would be pretty simple to add one.
>
> Brian Jones
> Programmer/Analyst
> Information Technology Services
> Support Services Building, Suite 4300
> Western University
> (519) 661-2111 x86969
> bjones86 at uwo.ca
>
> On 2014-11-11 10:27 AM, Neal Caidin wrote:
>
>> So it seems like it is well tested by Western University in production
>> and the main argument against is that it can not be disabled by
>> default? Does it create any new strings to be translated?
>>
>>
>> -- Neal
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Neal Caidin <neal.caidin at apereo.org
>> <mailto:neal.caidin at apereo.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Looping in Sakai PMC.
>>
>> Please see below.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Brian Jones <bjones86 at uwo.ca
>> <mailto:bjones86 at uwo.ca>> wrote:
>>
>> Just to clarify things, we here at Western have been running this
>> in
>> production since September, and are almost finished our 2nd round
>> of
>> internal QA testing on it. We've seen no adverse user impact.
>>
>> Brian Jones
>> Programmer/Analyst
>> Information Technology Services
>> Support Services Building, Suite 4300
>> Western University
>> (519) 661-2111 x86969 <tel:%28519%29%20661-2111%20x86969>
>> bjones86 at uwo.ca <mailto:bjones86 at uwo.ca>
>>
>> On 2014-11-11 10:16 AM, Neal Caidin wrote:
>> > That's an important point, thanks.
>> >
>> > I wonder if we are overdue for a training webinar on proper use
>> of the
>> > Sakai Jira? Doing one every so often couldn't hurt, especially
>> if it is
>> > specific to our workflow (not just generic Jira use, though
>> some may
>> > need this too).
>> >
>> > -- Neal
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Matthew Jones <
>> matthew at longsight.com <mailto:matthew at longsight.com>
>> > <mailto:matthew at longsight.com <mailto:matthew at longsight.com>>>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > For future reference, these should all have been linked in
>> jira as
>> > "depends on" rather than "related to" to help out the
>> branch manager
>> > tell if they can merge these or not. Caused a problem over
>> the
>> > weekend when one of these dependant jiras was marged before
>> > SAK-17606 was merged.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Matthew Jones
>> > <matthew at longsight.com <mailto:matthew at longsight.com>
>> <mailto:matthew at longsight.com <mailto:matthew at longsight.com>>>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Good catch, SAK-27838 should be reverted until all of
>> the other
>> > ones are added. Looking at the patch it probably
>> wouldn't cause
>> > a regression because isAnon is never set but it's not
>> needed
>> > without the others.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Neal Caidin
>> > <neal.caidin at apereo.org <mailto:neal.caidin at apereo.org>
>> <mailto:neal.caidin at apereo.org <mailto:neal.caidin at apereo.org>>>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Yes, I definitely had a question about SAK-28044.
>> >
>> > SAK-27838 looks like it is already merged into 10.x
>> . Are
>> > you saying we should revert the patch, or just make
>> sure it
>> > goes through a review process per "TCC Maintenance
>> Branch
>> > Merge Policy")? That looks like it is related to
>> SAK-27824.
>> >
>> > Or are these Jiras all related to each other since
>> they are
>> > about Anonymously grading Assignments? It seems
>> like Western
>> > University has done a bit of testing, but I'm not
>> clear if
>> > they have had these in production for a month (I
>> don't think
>> > so). And they seem to blur the line between
>> maintenance
>> > fixes and new feature?
>> >
>> > I'm not at all clear on this.
>> >
>> > Looking forward to others chiming in (Western U.
>> folks?).
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Neal
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > sakai-dev mailing list
>> > sakai-dev at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> <mailto:sakai-dev at collab.sakaiproject.org>
>> > http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-dev
>> >
>> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to
>> sakai-dev-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> <mailto:sakai-dev-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org> with a
>> subject of "unsubscribe"
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> sakai-dev mailing list
>> sakai-dev at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> <mailto:sakai-dev at collab.sakaiproject.org>
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-dev
>>
>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to
>> sakai-dev-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> <mailto:sakai-dev-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org> with a
>> subject of "unsubscribe"
>>
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai-dev/attachments/20141111/8edd7800/attachment.html
More information about the sakai-dev
mailing list