[Building Sakai] Upcoming content-review/assignments changes
Brian Baillargeon
bbailla2 at uwo.ca
Fri Jun 27 11:02:21 PDT 2014
Bryan Holladay and I have both committed to branches, and we're nearly
ready to merge into trunk.
In summary, we've:
* replaced hard coded references to 'Turnitin'
* allowed other content-review services / multiple services to run
side-by-side
* fixed issues where assignment submissions existed; instructors
changed the accepted submission types; student submissions were no
longer accessible or they could submit content that was no longer
accepted
* allowed multiple attachments and inline submissions to be submitted
to the content-review service
But we need a few things to happen before this gets merged.
Firstly, we will need somebody to look at KNL-1267. I think it's good;
it just needs more eyes. It's depended on by SAK-26329 which is depended
on by SAK-26322 which is a subtask of SAK-26318. Can anybody on the KNL
team take a look?
Secondly, who maintains the Turnitin content review implementation
(https://source.sakaiproject.org/contrib/turnitin/trunk/)? Neither of us
have commit.
Again, here is the master ticket:
https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-26318
Here are the branches that we have committed to:
https://source.sakaiproject.org/svn/content-review/branches/SAK-26318
https://source.sakaiproject.org/contrib/turnitin/branches/SAK-26318
https://source.sakaiproject.org/svn/assignment/branches/SAK-26318
And these are for Longsight's content-review service, VeriCite:
https://github.com/LongsightGroup/contentreview-federated.git
https://github.com/LongsightGroup/contentreview-impl-vericite
Thanks,
Brian Baillargeon
On 14-06-10 03:53 PM, Bryan Holladay wrote:
> This is being tracked under
> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-26318 and targeted for trunk.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Brian Baillargeon <bbailla2 at uwo.ca
> <mailto:bbailla2 at uwo.ca>> wrote:
>
> FYI to avoid duplicated efforts:
>
> Bryan Holladay and I will be making the following modifications to
> content-review as well as assignments:
>
> * Adding a federated content review service.
> o You will be able to run multiple content-review services
> side by side.
> * Cleaning up hard references of "Turnitin" / Turnitin specific
> configuration.
> o All references will point to your actual content-review
> service.
> * Multiple attachments as well as inline submissions will be
> content-reviewed.
> o Currently, only one attachment can be content-reviewed per
> submission; inline submissions are never reviewed.
> * The content-review api will provide a call to upload multiple
> resources and a call to retrieve multiple reports at once.
> o This will improve performance if your content-review
> service implementation uses, say, a web-service as opposed
> to the contentreview_item table.
> * The student's view of an assignment will always reflect the
> assignment's accepted submission type; students will always
> have access to their previously submitted material.
> o Currently, if a student tries to resubmit after the
> instructor has changed the assignment's accepted
> submission type (ie. from Inline & Attachments to Inline
> only), the student may not have access to their previously
> uploaded material or they may continue to submit
> attachments/inline text when it is no longer accepted.
>
> -Brian Baillargeon
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sakai-dev mailing list
> sakai-dev at collab.sakaiproject.org
> <mailto:sakai-dev at collab.sakaiproject.org>
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-dev
>
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to
> sakai-dev-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org
> <mailto:sakai-dev-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org> with a
> subject of "unsubscribe"
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai-dev/attachments/20140627/35e331ef/attachment.html
More information about the sakai-dev
mailing list