[Building Sakai] Suggestion for improvement of i18n and L10n handling in JIRA

[Beth Kirschner]

Hi Shoji,

   No problem -- I jumped the gun and have reverted the JIRA component to read "Internationalization".

- Beth

On Feb 6, 2012, at 3:44 AM, Shoji Kajita wrote:

> Hi Beth,
> 
> I found that "x-internationalization" you are proposing has been
> already available on Jira.
> 
> I think it is not a good solution because:
> 
>  1. it is NOT matching for "internationalization" (Jira tells me "No
>     Matches" when I'm typing in Component/s field in creating a Jira
>     issue so that almost nobody can use),
> 
>  2. we haven't reached the conclusion.
> 
> Please continue our discussion to find a better solution.
> 
> Best regards,
> Shoji
> 
> At Thu, 2 Feb 2012 10:43:10 -0500,
> Beth Kirschner wrote:
>> 
>> How about we try for a low-tech hack of changing the I18N component to sort alphabetically to the end -- ("x-Internationalization"). This will make sure the primary component owners get assigned?
>> 
>> - Beth
>> 
>> On Feb 2, 2012, at 7:11 AM, Jean-Francois Leveque wrote:
>> 
>>> All the CLE internationalization component issues are currently 
>>> automagically assigned to Beth Kirschner (Lead for this component in 
>>> JIRA) if the real component name is after Internationalization in 
>>> alphabetical order. She then assigns most of the issues to the real 
>>> component owner. I don't think this is really convenient.
>>> 
>>> Internationalization and translation issues are currently mixed in the 
>>> internationalization component. There is no way to know the ones are 
>>> internationalization from the ones that are translation.
>>> 
>>> A better solution for both issues is welcome if my suggestion is not 
>>> good enough.
>>> 
>>> J-F
>>> 
>>> On 31/01/2012 17:35, Aaron Zeckoski wrote:
>>>> That doesn't really sound easier to me and there are getting to be an
>>>> awful lot of checkboxes there. The current filters should do exactly
>>>> what you want without a lot of work to make this change in JIRA.
>>>> -AZ
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Jean-Francois Leveque
>>>> <jean-francois.leveque at upmc.fr>  wrote:
>>>>> Hi
>>>>> 
>>>>> Currently, SAK issues can have internationalization in the list of
>>>>> components.
>>>>> 
>>>>> AFAICT, the only real internationalization component has been in kernel
>>>>> since the creation of kernel with Sakai 2.6.0.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Currently the JIRA internationalization component is used both for L10n
>>>>> and i18n issues.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I suggest we stop using this component and add 2 new check-boxes (like
>>>>> the Maintenance Team Issue one):
>>>>> Internationalization Issue
>>>>> Localization Issue
>>>>> 
>>>>> It seems to me this way will be easier to check which languages have
>>>>> been updated or to look for internationalization issues.
>>>>> 
>>>>> What do you think ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> 
>>>>> J-F
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sakai-dev mailing list
>>> sakai-dev at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-dev
>>> 
>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to sakai-dev-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> sakai-dev mailing list
>> sakai-dev at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-dev
>> 
>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to sakai-dev-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
> 
>