[Building Sakai] T&Q capacity to avoid duplicate target items from pool

Paul Dagnall pdagnall1 at udayton.edu
Tue Apr 10 18:03:53 PDT 2012


Our users have done things similar to this. It basically was accomplished
by creating large amounts of sub-pools without any redundancy and each
"question" was actually a random draw "part" that selects a single question
from the sub-pool.

This isn't exactly easy on the user but it's an uncommon use case.

Paul Dagnall
Application Developer & Administrator
University of Dayton


On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Keli Sato Amann <kamann at stanford.edu>wrote:

> Hi David,
> We want to make sure we understand your question, so let me see if I can
> rephrase it so that the developers can answer:
>
> 1) As a very simple example, let's say you want to make sure someone
> understands the words for 8 colors. Each color has 3 possible questions,
> for instance
> The grass is ___ (a color)
> Frogs are stereotypically ___ (a color)
> Emeralds are  ___ (a color)
>
> Let's say instead of a thousand questions, you have exactly 24 questions
> in your pool: 3 each for each of 8 colors. If in an 8 question test you
> only wanted 1 question per color, you couldn't put them all in one pool.
> You would need to assign a different pool to each of the 8 colors, then
> assign one pool per question.
>
>  But in real life, you have hundreds of words, and you only get to quiz
> people on 8 of those. So you want to know is it feasible to add a feature
> that allows Samigo to detect the right answer to a question or add the
> metatag "green" to the question so that when drawing questions, you never
> draw more than one question with the same answer?
>
> 2) As to your second question, I am not sure if you are asking whether you
> can have multiple correct answers for Fill in the Blanks (yes, you can) or
> if multicorrect would make the detection of repeat answers (detected
> directly or via meta tag) more difficult. I think you mean the latter. I
> suspect it's only slightly more difficult than addressing #1 above, but #1
> might be very difficult.
>
> Our developers don't have the capacity to develop this feature request for
> you, but they could probably advise you on your approach.
>
> Keli Amann
> User Experience Specialist
> Academic Computing Services, Stanford University
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Minugh < David.Minugh at english.su.se >
> Date: Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 5:01 AM
> Subject: [Building Sakai] T&Q capacity to avoid duplicate target items
> from pool
> To: " sakai-dev at collab.sakaiproject.org " <
> sakai-dev at collab.sakaiproject.org >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Apologies in advance for the length of this query, and uncertainty about
> whether it’s the developer or user forum this should be directed to, but it
> has to do with whether Sakai can handle pool questions of this type:
>
>
>
> We are implementing a traditional-type English-only vocabulary test
> drawing on a database. The test consists of several sections, but for
> simplicity’s sake consider the section where each item is a sentence with a
> one-word slot where the student provides the answer. Each student gets a
> random selection of items (i.e., no two students get the same test). The
> items are drawn from frequency bands, with e.g. 8 items randomly selected
> per 1000-word band (with cognates, names and other less suitable items
> eliminated, the actual band pool is 200±100 items).
>
>
>
> As we expand the pool, we would like to have multiple questions for each
> target word, and the problem then arises of whether Sakai’s T&Q can be
> configured to prevent Sakai from selecting several questions with the same
> answer. In a fully random sample of 8 items from a 200-word base, with 3
> questions per word, the overlap for e.g. the 8 th item ought to be =14/600,
> if the first 7 contain no overlaps. This suggests that for a 400-person
> test, a dozen or so will get two questions on the same word, which doesn’t
> seem acceptable, and wouldn’t be in a normal written test. A cascading
> system with several thousand sub-pools seems less reasonable than a check
> that prevents several questions with identical answers, but does Sakai have
> such a capacity?
>
>
>
> A secondary problem arises from the nature of the fill-in questions: we
> use Nation’s pattern of giving the students the first two letters of the
> word, plus a rough definition or synonym, to limit the options. This works
> fine for most words in English ( It was of no AV__ [ help ] would target
> avail , but not use ), but expecially for many words with prefixes such as
> in - or re -, there can be multiple acceptable answers ( It was her IN___
> destiny [ unavoidable ] must accept at least
> inevitable|ineluctable|inescapable , and this too needs to be handled.
>
>
>
> The same problem arises if we consider the multiple-choice section (except
> the program then needs to match the answer words, not the actual answer a,
> b, c, d, e).
>
>
>
> The attractiveness of the individualized test is its asynchronic capacity:
> we don’t have the lab capacity to administer a lock-down test to 400
> students at a time.
>
>
>
> Has anyone solved this already? Or do we need to rethink our test format?
>
>
>
> All the best,
>
>
>
> David C. Minugh E-mail: David.Minugh at english.su.se
>
> Director of Studies Tel: (+46) 8 16 36 11
>
> English Department Cell phone: (+46) 70 - 23 14 777
>
> Stockholm University Office: E 877, Frescati
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sakai-dev mailing list
> sakai-dev at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-dev
>
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to
> sakai-dev-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of
> "unsubscribe"
> _______________________________________________
> sakai-dev mailing list
> sakai-dev at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-dev
>
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to
> sakai-dev-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of
> "unsubscribe"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai-dev/attachments/20120410/f637d74e/attachment.html 


More information about the sakai-dev mailing list