[Building Sakai] spring-webmvc in shared

[David Horwitz]

I know polls doesn't use webmvc - I'm not sure what in trunk does, but 
the edia google maps tool at least used to might be an interesting test case

D

On 06/28/2011 09:19 AM, David Wafula wrote:
> Cool. I considered possibility of using spring 3 controller, was 
> really not sure how to configure it in web.xml. Not even sure it can 
> work, am trying to play with it. If you get anything like that going, 
> would be great.
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:31 PM, John Bush <john.bush at rsmart.com 
> <mailto:john.bush at rsmart.com>> wrote:
>
>     ok, I think it depends on the tool, osp-presentation gave me an error
>     trying to use spring-webmvc 3, but polls works fine.  So since I'm
>     looking to use spring 3.0 webmvc in a new tool, looks like this might
>     work, will have to see if we run into anything along the way.
>
>     On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:25 PM, John Bush <john.bush at rsmart.com
>     <mailto:john.bush at rsmart.com>> wrote:
>     > Well, this simple change will take the spring-mvc out of shared and
>     > then the tools start including it again.  Quick test of osp and
>     polls
>     > looks fine:
>     >
>     > Macintosh-74:kernel jbush$ svn diff
>     > Index: pom.xml
>     > ===================================================================
>     > --- pom.xml     (revision 27918)
>     > +++ pom.xml     (working copy)
>     > @@ -568,7 +568,7 @@
>     > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
>     > <artifactId>spring-webmvc</artifactId>
>     > <version>2.5.6.SEC02</version>
>     > - <scope>provided</scope>
>     > + <!--scope>provided</scope-->
>     > </dependency>
>     > <dependency>
>     > <groupId>javax.activation</groupId>
>     >
>     > There is work going on to look at Spring 3.0 moving forward here:
>     > https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/KNL-517
>     >
>     > I was hoping to see if I could at least use spring3 webmvc in a tool
>     > with core still at 2.5.6, but first pass seems to cause some error,
>     > still digging into that a bit.  I think if this was possible that
>     > would be a good compromise between those wanting to hold off on full
>     > upgrade to spring 3.0, because at least tool devs could start using
>     > some of the features in say spring mvc only.
>     >
>     > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:12 PM, David Wafula
>     <davidwaf at gmail.com <mailto:davidwaf at gmail.com>> wrote:
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:37 PM, John Bush
>     <john.bush at rsmart.com <mailto:john.bush at rsmart.com>> wrote:
>     >>>
>     >>> ....... Now with
>     >>> this in shared, tools aren't able to say update to spring 3.0 web.
>     >>> Was there some reason kernel decided to start putting this into
>     >>> shared?  I don't think its actually a requirement for any
>     reason I'm
>     >>> aware of.
>     >>>
>     >>
>     >> I also ran into trouble trying to use spring 3 in a tool, may
>     be  this
>     >> should be reconsidered in future releases?
>     >> regards,
>     >> --
>     >> David Wafula
>     >>
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     > John Bush
>     > 602-490-0470 <tel:602-490-0470>
>     >
>
>
>
>     --
>     John Bush
>     602-490-0470 <tel:602-490-0470>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> David Wafula
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sakai-dev mailing list
> sakai-dev at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-dev
>
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to sakai-dev-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai-dev/attachments/20110628/e8d7570a/attachment.html