[Building Sakai] spring-webmvc in shared

John Bush john.bush at rsmart.com
Mon Jun 27 12:31:59 PDT 2011


ok, I think it depends on the tool, osp-presentation gave me an error
trying to use spring-webmvc 3, but polls works fine.  So since I'm
looking to use spring 3.0 webmvc in a new tool, looks like this might
work, will have to see if we run into anything along the way.

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:25 PM, John Bush <john.bush at rsmart.com> wrote:
> Well, this simple change will take the spring-mvc out of shared and
> then the tools start including it again.  Quick test of osp and polls
> looks fine:
>
> Macintosh-74:kernel jbush$ svn diff
> Index: pom.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- pom.xml     (revision 27918)
> +++ pom.xml     (working copy)
> @@ -568,7 +568,7 @@
>                 <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
>                 <artifactId>spring-webmvc</artifactId>
>                 <version>2.5.6.SEC02</version>
> -                <scope>provided</scope>
> +                <!--scope>provided</scope-->
>             </dependency>
>             <dependency>
>                 <groupId>javax.activation</groupId>
>
> There is work going on to look at Spring 3.0 moving forward here:
> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/KNL-517
>
> I was hoping to see if I could at least use spring3 webmvc in a tool
> with core still at 2.5.6, but first pass seems to cause some error,
> still digging into that a bit.  I think if this was possible that
> would be a good compromise between those wanting to hold off on full
> upgrade to spring 3.0, because at least tool devs could start using
> some of the features in say spring mvc only.
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:12 PM, David Wafula <davidwaf at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:37 PM, John Bush <john.bush at rsmart.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> ....... Now with
>>> this in shared, tools aren't able to say update to spring 3.0 web.
>>> Was there some reason kernel decided to start putting this into
>>> shared?  I don't think its actually a requirement for any reason I'm
>>> aware of.
>>>
>>
>> I also ran into trouble trying to use spring 3 in a tool, may be  this
>> should be reconsidered in future releases?
>> regards,
>> --
>> David Wafula
>>
>
>
>
> --
> John Bush
> 602-490-0470
>



-- 
John Bush
602-490-0470


More information about the sakai-dev mailing list