[Building Sakai] Rutgers is now using innodb-plugin in production

[Steve Swinsburg]

Hi Mike,

What is your hibernate dialect?

cheers,
Steve



On 20/12/2011, at 11:41 AM, Jennings, Michael wrote:

> At UNC we are using MySql 5.5 Enterprises edition with Sakai 2.7.0 without any issues so far.
> 
> We are also in the process of upgrading to 2.8.1 and  things look good so far
> 
> Mike
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> -------- Original message --------
> Subject: Re: [Building Sakai] Rutgers is now using innodb-plugin in production 
> From: Steve Swinsburg <steve.swinsburg at gmail.com> 
> To: Hedrick Charles <hedrick at rutgers.edu> 
> CC: "sakai-dev at collab.sakaiproject.org Developers" <sakai-dev at collab.sakaiproject.org> 
> 
> 
> Any version pre 2.9 doesn't work too well but post 2.9 may be ok. YMMV though and it hasn't been QA'd or endorsed, only 5.1.
> 
> cheers,
> Steve
> 
> 
> 
> On 20/12/2011, at 11:14 AM, Hedrick Charles wrote:
> 
> > No. My understanding was that Sakai wasn't supported for 5.5. 
> > 
> > On Dec 19, 2011, at 6:46:05 PM, Robert Cohen wrote:
> > 
> >> 
> >> Did you evaluate mysql 5.5?
> >> From what I've read its supposed to have performance improvements over 5.1
> >> even with the innodb plugin.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On 20/12/11 5:54 AM, "Charles Hedrick" <hedrick at rutgers.edu> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> We've had two episodes of the database server going to 100%. Because some
> >>> of my tests have shown that innodb-plugin works better under some kinds
> >>> of load, we're moving to it. We also had a DNS problem that might have
> >>> contributed to this. It's been fixed, so if our problems don't come back
> >>> we may not be sure what caused it.
> >>> 
> >>> We're using old versions of mysql 5.1, simply because we haven't wanted
> >>> to upgrade in the middle of the year, 5.1.44 with innodb plugin 1.0.6.
> >>> We'll probably be moving from our Solaris-based server to a server on
> >>> Linux running the newest 5.1, in late January. It's the final part of our
> >>> new Xenserver / iSCSI virtual architecture. After looking at various test
> >>> results I've decided to run the new system with hypertheading on. Innodb
> >>> plugin should deal with the multicore scaling problems sufficiently for
> >>> that to make sense.
> >>> 
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> sakai-dev mailing list
> >>> sakai-dev at collab.sakaiproject.org
> >>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-dev
> >>> 
> >>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to
> >>> sakai-dev-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of
> >>> "unsubscribe"
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > sakai-dev mailing list
> > sakai-dev at collab.sakaiproject.org
> > http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-dev
> > 
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to sakai-dev-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sakai-dev mailing list
> sakai-dev at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai-dev
> 
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to sakai-dev-unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/sakai-dev/attachments/20111220/eee396ed/attachment.html