[Deploying Sakai] Administration Workspace/On-Line/Locations: not up-to-date (2.5.x)
Jean-Francois Leveque
jean-francois.leveque at upmc.fr
Wed Apr 1 08:12:05 PDT 2009
Thanks,
Jean-Francois
Nuno Fernandes a écrit :
> Hi Jean-Francois,
> I found the JIRA with some 'related/dependent on' issues linked, please take
> a look:
>
> Better Presence Bookeeping
> http://jira.sakaiproject.org/jira/browse/SAK-5538
>
> Thanks,
> Nuno
>
>
>
> 2009/4/1 Jean-Francois Leveque <jean-francois.leveque at upmc.fr>
>
>> Nuno Fernandes a écrit :
>>
>>> Is there a JIRA for this problem?
>>> I though so, but I can't find the apropriate JIRA (if it really exists)!
>>>
>> Please create one for us, you know more than I do about it.
>>
>> Are there other solutions?
>>> As far as I know, no. This could be implemented as a quartz job, which
>>> would
>>> be more Sakai integrated...
>>>
>> Do you know how to do it, Nuno?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>> Nuno
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Jean-Francois
>>>>
>>>> Nuno Fernandes a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jean-Francois,
>>>>
>>>>> We run everyday a perl script through /etc/cron at 4 am that cleans
>>>>> Sakai
>>>>> sessions older than 12 hours. See attachment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hope it helps,
>>>>> Nuno
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2009/3/31 Jean-Francois Leveque <jean-francois.leveque at upmc.fr>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is part of what I get:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2 at location: !admin-610 : location: !admin-610
>>>>>>
>>>>>> leveque 178c8dc7-7877-4c67-00a9-603f300400e7 134.157.42.16
>>>>>> Mozilla/5.0
>>>>>> (X11; U; Linux i686; fr; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080702 Iceweasel/
>>>>>> 2.0.0.16
>>>>>> (Debian-2.0.0.16-0etch1) Sep 25, 2008 11:43 am
>>>>>>
>>>>>> leveque 5785c590-6cf8-42e8-ac0e-b50177c9fd04 134.157.42.116
>>>>>> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081202
>>>>>> Iceweasel/2.0.0.19 (Debian-2.0.0.19-0etch1) Mar 31, 2009 9:44 am
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> While "Mar 31, 2009 9:44 am" is correct and belongs to an active
>>>>>> session, "Sep 25, 2008 11:43 am" obviously does not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have complaints from users saying user presences are displayed when
>>>>>> they should not be. I get the same outdated locations with a
>>>>>> "-presence"
>>>>>> location for them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am I the only one getting this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do we already have a solution for this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jean-Francois
>>>>>>
>
>
More information about the production
mailing list