[DG: Teaching & Learning] Review of Learning Capabilities spreadsheet

Kenneth Robert Romeo kenro at stanford.edu
Wed Dec 16 08:52:20 PST 2009


Hello everyone,

As we discussed last week, I started looking at the spreadsheet from the
bottom up.  I spent quite a bit longer on this than I expected and I am
not quite done yet.  As I started to move up the list, looking for
duplicates and making sure the themes and workflows were assigned
properly, I realized that I was not clear on the difference between a
theme and a workflow.  There are even (nearly) duplicate entries in the
list of examples (row 3).  Also, as I moved through the first 50 or so, I
realized that while most of the entries could be called unique, it would
be possible to say that quite a few are subsumed under larger goals, with
a bit of creative categorization.  For example, just taking the idea that
content should be shareable, you would cover quite a few entries.  Some
are extensions, some are subsets, some are special cases, etc.

So, what I started doing was making my own categories, just for my own
reference, which may or may not be helpful to others.  The list is below.


My next step was to try assigning a category to each of the rows.  In the
process of doing that, I have realized that there are many entries that
need more than one category, which is, I guess, probably not surprising.
So I am not quite done, and, again, I don't know if it will be useful to
others, so I am not putting it in the main spreadsheet, mostly because I
think this whole process should be open to discussion, separate from all
of the ideas that have been posted.  In a sense, though, the categories
could be very important, because they will guide the larger
functionalities of Sakai3 (and beyond).  

Anyway, the meeting is about to start, so I will just quit here and send
this.

Talk to you soon,

Ken Romeo

[http://kenro.web.stanford.edu]

Academic Technology Specialist [http://ats.stanford.edu]

Stanford Language Center [http://language.stanford.edu]

 

 

 

content creation: 

* text:  templates for citations and formulas

* real-time collaboration

* video - ingest to streaming

* text - ingest doc, xls, ppt, pdf, etc to web viewable (no download
necessary)

* complex - ingest tests to web applicable

* attach - any content anywhere, including feedback in any form, including
grade, including reflection

* attach content anywhere i.e. rubrics to assignments and then feedback

* annotation and correction to all media (text, audio, video) 

* feeds for change and creation notice

* history - team project - tracking contributions by membership

 

permissions and membership

* individual to group

* item / material to feed to question to pool to site

* applicable to parts of items / materials - to allow for anonymous
grading

* ability to create ad-hoc groups

* submission / post sign-off (with comment) by multiple individuals

* role play = ability to relabel members as roles temporarily / within a
certain context

 

automation

* release assignments / material contingent on other actions (not just
dates)

* IRT based item selection

* screenflow ability to build sequences with controls on order,
functionality and timing

 

interface

* accessibility

* pbx interface on all components, including threaded discussion

* small browser

 

components

* email in all components

* contextual help for system / content

* allow signup for groups that have open enrollment

* print - including some ability to synthesize and summarize complex
content such as assessments, perhaps flagging parts for printing

* reporting based on self-authored queries

* packaging for migration and download, including options for grouping
(folders)

* threaded discussion

* assignment submission

 

labels

* bookmarking

* tagging

* link other content

 

scoring

* attach a grade anywhere

* scoring component - explanation of grading criteria (rubric), feedback
box, fill in a number, drop down menu number / letter, multiple dropdown
menus (rubric)

 

administration

* works out of the box

* calendar including private tasks

* student evaluations

* event scheduling

* student view

* track attendance

* site creation with pre-specified restrictions - to allow breakout rooms

* many innovative uses can be achieved with existing functionality, but
some guidance needs to be given in order to achieve this

 

activity logging and notification

* changes to items

* new items

* millisecond records of time on task >> site >> system

* specific fields on items / materials - to allow double, blind grading

 

communication / notifications

* changes

** feeds

** text

** voicemail

* new content creation

* submissions

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/pedagogy/attachments/20091216/32df98f5/attachment.html 


More information about the pedagogy mailing list