[Contrib: Evaluation System] Design review Wednesday August 22 @ 9:00 am pacific

[Adam Marshall]

Sorry for the late reply. All looks good to me, I look forward to seeing the changes.

adam

-----Original Message-----
From: azeckoski at gmail.com [mailto:azeckoski at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Aaron Zeckoski
Sent: 22 August 2012 22:36
To: Daphne Ogle
Cc: Adam Marshall; evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org; Judy Stern; jwlipp at berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Contrib: Evaluation System] Design review Wednesday August 22 @ 9:00 am pacific

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Daphne Ogle <daphne at media.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> My Evaluations
>
> a/ I guess we’d like the EN GB properties file to keep the old 
> terminology “surveys awaiting release”, “completed surveys” etc
>
> We didn't change the terminology for those so I believe the EN GB 
> files won't be affected.  Aaron - can you confirm?

We didn't touch any foreign translations.


> c/ surveys can have extension dates, I know these aren’t currently 
> displayed but they could be
>
> Can you say more?  Does the extension just extend the due date?  Where 
> would you like to see it?

I assume this is referring to the grace period. We don't display the grace period because it is only there to allow people to submit late is not really meant to shown to anyone.


> e/ what happens with public surveys where a percentage cannot be 
> calculated for the response rate column.
>
> I'm not familiar with the public survey functionality.  Can you describe it?
> What happens now since that column already exists?

It works the same way it always has. We did not change that.


> g/ How do survey categories get displayed?
> (https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/EVALSYS-1104) – we don’t use 
> them but some may
>
> Ah - interesting.  I didn't even realize they existed.  Since we don't 
> use them at Berkeley, I assume they'll just display in the same way they do now.
> Aaron - can you confirm?

It displays the same way it always has. We did not change it.


> k/ wont the dates column be a bit wide if the full names of months are 
> used, currently we have 3 letter month abbreviations? Space could be 
> saved be using shorted names.
>
> I don't think we've changed the display of the months so if it is 
> currently showing 3 letters than it should stay the same. Aaron - can you confirm?

We did not change the date formatting.


-AZ


--
Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile