[Contrib: Evaluation System] Evaluation QA

[Sean DeMonner]

I think Michigan would take the items it's merging. But we still need  
to come up with a target set of features and date for the next tag  
(1.2.2?) which would then drive the testing effort, I believe.

SMD.


On Nov 4, 2009, at 5:53 AM, Lovemore Nalube wrote:

> It's me again :)
>
> Not to appear like a spambot, one quick question: Who is  
> responsible for the QA of the action items agreed on in the recent  
> evals teleconference? http://confluence.sakaiproject.org//x/9Q-tAw
>
> I am curious since all merged Jiras don't seem to have any positive  
> QA ratings in this table.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> --
> Lovemore Nalube
> Online Learning Environments Developer (Vula)
> PASS Transformation Committee REP
> Centre for Educational Technology
> CHED
> University of Cape Town
> www.cet.uct.ac.za
>
> /* Work Email: lovemore.nalube at uct.ac.za
> /* Cell: 076 186 1244
> /* GTalk: lovenalube at gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> evaluation mailing list
> evaluation at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/evaluation
>
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send email to evaluation- 
> unsubscribe at collab.sakaiproject.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"


SMD.


==========================================================
Sean DeMonner, IT Senior Project Manager, CTools Implementation Group
Digital Media Commons @ The Duderstadt Center, U-M      (734) 615-9765
Pub Key 24DD6B09




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/evaluation/attachments/20091104/61ffe9fd/attachment.html