[cle-release-team] [sakai2-tcc] summary - Re: VOTE: Release of Sakai 2.9.2

[Anthony Whyte]

I recommend we forgo a second formal release vote re: 2.9.2 and instead operate under the rules of lazy consensus.  As Neal has summarized below, three issues have been uncovered in RC03 that have been reviewed by a number of TCC members over the past 24 hours.  

The plan is to 

1. address SAK-23395 and SAK-13395
2. see if we can untangle the 2.9.x merge regression summarized in KNL-1081 by Friday, 24 May 2013.  If not punt to 2.9.3.
3. forgo an RC4 tag in favor of direct 2.9.x testing
4. release on or before 30/31 May 2013

If any TCC member objects to the above plan and/or believes we need require another formal release vote please say so on list.

Cheers,

Anth



On May 23, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Neal Caidin wrote:

> 
> Three issues were reviewed on the CLE release team call - http://etherpad.ctools.org/rmmt-2013-05-23
> 
> 
> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-23639   - Webdav issue, data loss involved. Fixed and already merged into 2.9.x
> 
> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-23395  - neo-portal issue . Decided to get this in the release as well.
> 
> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/KNL-1081 - dropbox quota issue. Regression compared to 2.8.x but issue exists in 2.9.0 . When I was on the call the team was thinking that if it can be fixed and tested by Friday, then it would make the release. But on the notes it says it is a blocker to the release.
> 
> That's the status as I understand it. 
> 
> When fixed, testing will be on 2.9.x server (unless that has changed too? not sure how testing will proceed for SAK-23395.)
> 
> Thanks,
> Neal
> 
> 
> On May 22, 2013, at 5:13 PM, Aaron Zeckoski <azeckoski at unicon.net> wrote:
> 
>> Unfortunately I think the principal of this "(provided no issues are
>> found during final testing)" has been broken by a data loss related
>> blocker so I think we will not be able to release 2.9.2 after all. We
>> will discuss options on the CLE team call tomorrow.
>> Sam has merged the fix for the blocker into 2.9.x already so I think
>> we are likely looking at another round of RC + QA.
>> 
>> -AZ
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:24 PM, May, Megan Marie <mmmay at indiana.edu> wrote:
>>> Proposal:  The release of Sakai 2.9.2 (provided no issues are found during
>>> final testing).
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> There are currently no blockers for a 2.9.2 release and Neal has polled the
>>> Security WG, CLE Team, and QA Teams with no objections made to the readiness
>>> of the release.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Voting is now OPEN immediately.
>>> 
>>> Voting ends Friday, May 24, 2013, 23:59 UTC
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> This is a public, on-list vote. Approval is indicated by a "+1", abstain by
>>> a "0" and disapproval by "-1". A single -1 vote based on a material
>>> objection will block action. However, -1 blocking votes can be overridden by
>>> a 2/3-majority roll call vote of active TCC members.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Megan
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sakai2-tcc mailing list
>>> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Aaron Zeckoski - Software Architect - http://tinyurl.com/azprofile
>> _______________________________________________
>> sakai2-tcc mailing list
>> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sakai2-tcc mailing list
> sakai2-tcc at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/sakai2-tcc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/cle-release-team/attachments/20130523/26e6d1ac/attachment-0006.html